Jurassic Park 3 sucked

glukkon_daniel · #1 07-19-2001, 07:51 PM

It sure did.

globe90 · #2 07-19-2001, 10:19 PM

I deem that "unsurprise of the century."
Thank you.

Statikk HDM · #3 07-20-2001, 12:14 AM

That review SUXS! You just can't say a movie is a worthless piece of shit, you have to tell us why it sucked dino dong so much. Plus just because it's a sequel doesn't mean it has to be a shameless way to get more mone. Look at jaws 4,all of the goosebumps books,may they be shining becons of hope in this desolate land of entertainment not all sequels must be pathetic. Wait a minute, those things sucked

glukkon_daniel · #4 07-20-2001, 01:43 AM

It sucked because:

It sucked.
It sucked.
It sucked.
And, oh yeah, it swallowed.

LuxoJr · #5 07-20-2001, 11:32 AM

Who woulda thunk it?

The only good part in the second one was when that guy got torn in two by the tyrannosaurs. They also cut out all the good bits in Chrichton's original book, like the motorbike chase.

[ July 20, 2001: Message edited by: LuxoJr ]

Danny · #6 07-20-2001, 12:14 PM

i don't really see how it could be any less entertaining than Jurassic Park 2...

anyway, it doesn't have to be shit just because it's a sequel, statikk, it might just be shit by coincidence.

the only good sequels i can think of offhand are Aliens and Toy Story 2.

anime_2day · #7 07-20-2001, 01:56 PM

Don't forget Terminator 2 Rettick

Danny · #8 07-20-2001, 05:41 PM

oh yeah. any more suggestions would be welcome.

glukkon_daniel · #9 07-20-2001, 08:00 PM

Austin Powers 2

globe90 · #10 07-21-2001, 04:46 PM

Die Hard 2, Abe's Exoddus.
I don't have anything against sequels themselves, but when I saw the ads for JP3, I was like, "What? 2 was a flop, so they're making a 3? They need some of those superintelligent raptors on the staff."

Danny · #11 07-21-2001, 05:07 PM

i guess they thought "2 was so bad, how can 3 be worse?"

glukkon_daniel · #12 07-21-2001, 05:53 PM

Die Hard one was better than Die Hard 2, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

Sl'askia · #13 07-21-2001, 06:12 PM

i plan on seeing it either this weekend or the next (most likely next weekend...as I avoid seeing a movie on the opening weekend..), so I will see for myself...

SpikeyMudokonPunk · #14 07-23-2001, 05:51 PM

Don't believe Daniel! That was an action packed movie! See it

Melvin:squeeking paramite · #15 07-23-2001, 05:56 PM

I saw it a while ago...it was ok. not that great. thats just my opinion though.
The God father sequels. ummm... back to the future sequels were ok. Evil dead 2 and army of Darkness were superior to the first,I think. Wes Craven's New Nightmare. Most sequels are pretty bad,sad to say... JP3 was better than 2.

SpikeyMudokonPunk · #16 07-23-2001, 05:57 PM

Yeah, like lil' Mermaid 2! Bwahah! It sucked.

glukkon_daniel · #17 07-23-2001, 08:14 PM

It was action-packed, I can't argue there. Too bad all the action was cliched and boring and not suspenseful and just plain old DUMB. The whole movie felt rushed. It barely had a plot at all.

IT SUCKED.

Yemmling · #18 07-23-2001, 08:24 PM

ooh! i know a good sequel....anyone remember when i posted a topic calling to 'anyone with a sense of humour?' that topic was about earthbound...a game tied with oddworld for my favorite, and the earthbound we have here is the sequel to earthbound in japan (in japan they are actually called mother and mother 2 not earthbound)

Lampion · #19 07-24-2001, 03:54 AM

I watched Jurassick Park 3 a few hours ago. It's a good action movie, with good visual effects and great dinosaur acting. But I have to say it's not a deep movie, it is just like the other two.

The first one was great, innovative, original. The second one was not that great, mostly because of Jeff Goldblum(Malcon)'s horrible performance, I'm really glad he is not in the third movie.

There is nothing new in the 3rd one, except for a couple of new dinosaurs, and the new discovery made by Doctor Grant (Sam Neil, the main reason I went to the theather to see this movie).

Dr. Grant thinks that Velociraptors are very, very smart creatures, highly social, and capable of complex communication bettween each other, and he will soon know he is right... This is the best part of the plot, and it could be well developed. Unfortunately, the movie ends just like the others, giving us the felling that what the producers want to do is just an endless sequence of Jurassic Park movies, each one giving us a little glimpse of dinosaurs universe.

I'd give it 3, out of 5.

Niteowl · #20 07-24-2001, 04:31 AM

Anyone else see the loose end in the second movie?
Where the ship collided with the mainland and the whole crew were all dead....T-Rex was trapped in the hold- what killed those guys????

Sl'askia · #21 07-24-2001, 04:41 AM

well a friend of mine said that Raptors might have snuck on board...but Raptor's can't literally bite a person and just leave their severed hands...so I don't know..its a mystery to me..

Edit: wait wait! I think i know...remember the T-Rex was in that cage thingy on the deck, but it broke out of it when it woke up, killed the crew, and THEN got itself trapped in the hold...

[ July 23, 2001: Message edited by: Dragadon ]

Dakkan Blackblade · #22 07-24-2001, 04:32 PM

That movie sucked dick on a stick.

But, It was funny when the raptor said, "alen"... I was cryin' I was laughin so hard...

SpikeyMudokonPunk · #23 07-24-2001, 05:06 PM

It was better than jurassic park 2, that sucked. 1 and 3 were better.

Niteowl · #24 08-01-2001, 02:39 AM

Just saw it today...
Did the people seem a little blase when they were on the copter and they see pterodactyls flying?
The people nearly got eaten by those and they see the critters flying(read 'no longer confined to the island')and everyone is smiling and acting like it's cool. Or did I miss something...I would've though it would be as sinister as a pack of raptors learning to sail a boat...
And the raptors seemed to find humans a little less to their taste...They kill that guy in the jungle but don't eat him...and when they get their eggs back, it's like
'Thank you for returning our eggs-Have a nice day.'

[ July 31, 2001: Message edited by: Niteowl ]

Sl'askia · #25 08-01-2001, 03:04 AM

i saw the movie last saturday. I liked it...but to be completely honest I felt it did lack something...something the previous two had (im sure it wasn't the plot...), cant put my claw on it though.

Joe the Intern · #26 08-01-2001, 05:43 AM

the first one didnt really follow the books (even though they were based on them!!) so i think its pretty stupid thy made a three. 2 was gay thanks to jeff goldblum

[ July 31, 2001: Message edited by: Joe the Intern ]

Danny · #27 08-01-2001, 06:22 PM

i liked the character of Ian Malcolm in the books, and i thought Jeff did okay in JP1, but for some reason he was totally off in JP2. i'm not sure why... i think maybe he's not very good at being the main character...

Sexy Slig · #28 08-01-2001, 06:37 PM

Why waz the first one so good? and the rest, well, kinda shit?

Danny · #29 08-01-2001, 07:06 PM

if you'd read either of the books, you would see how shit all the films were by comparison...

PinkHaired Mudokon CWR · #30 08-01-2001, 07:11 PM

I read the book in 7th grade, and our whole class failed the test because we didi not read the book. WE just watch the movie and we all got like 12's and the lowest was like 5 or 7.