Incest!

[Nate]

Hey, if I have sex with your sister, would you feel it? Hmmmm?

What about if they're conjoined?

[Havoc]

Yay Oanst!

[OANST]

What about if they're conjoined?

Oh, god. That is so hot!

[ArtemisPanthar]

Why would anyone say that to you, was it just a random guy who said that?

Almost everyone says it once they learn I'm a twin. Some people are just trying to be funny, some others honestly think that's how it works...

Hey, if I have sex with your sister, would you feel it? Hmmmm?

Only if its spectacular (so, no)

[OANST]

Only if its spectacular (so, no)

You win this round, but I've got my eye on you. And your sister.

[AlexFili]

Usually all of the things which are illegal are morally and ethically wrong.

[Wings of Fire]

That's because our law system stems from Christian and Judaic teachings.

[OddjobAbe]

Usually all

Oxymoron ho!

Not always. Some laws are there for what I suspect to be the government's own sake, and soley their own sake.

And listen to Wings of Fire. But replace "all" with "a lot".

[OANST]

Usually all of the things which are illegal are morally and ethically wrong.

You might be surprised. Where I live consensual anal sex is a crime.

[ArtemisPanthar]

Usually all of the things which are illegal are morally and ethically wrong.

So interracial marriage/sex is morally and ethically wrong? Because that used to be illegal.

[OANST]

Yeah, but we obviously need to protect the gene pool from mesegination. Right? Am I right?

[joshkrz]

@Alex: That dosen't explain why you can have a relationship and or marry your cousins.

[Anonyman!]

Usually all of the things which are illegal are morally and ethically wrong.

Where I live it is illegal to have sex in any position other than missionary.
Not really enforced, but still.
Fuck you.

[Wings of Fire]

Virginia wasn't it? I believe that state also has a law making it illegal to go outside of your house without a planned destination.

[used:)]

Does Florida still have that law that permits absolutely anyone the right to shoot another person in public if they feel the need to defend themselves?

Looking back on my posts, I sound like a goddamn Republican. DX

[Voodoo Hand]

The gut reaction to the mention of incest more often than not is negative,because the first thing that comes to mind is not consensual sex between siblings, it`s adult-child sex.
Difficult to think that this anything to do with "consensual" .

The stipulation that it "does no harm" is a bit weak too.I can`t recall ever seeing any press about a well adjusted adult saying that an incestuous relationship was a good thing in their life . However, I have seen way too much crap like this, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritzl_case.

Don`t know about the rest of the world, but in the U.S. one of the most used
defense tactics in criminal cases is that " so and so was sexually abused by a family member".

Conceptually , in terms of a human`s right to do as they choose, incest could have some basis of support , but in practice it does not show any positive results.

[Bullet Magnet]

You have to start defining what is healthy, what isn't and why, or you could take that line of reasoning and apply it to anything.

[Wil]

If people automatically equate all incest with child rape, it says more about the current obsession of pædophilia than the actual proportions of incestuous relationships. Neither same-generation nor cross-generation incest comes more to mind than the other, although I only know people who have partaken in the former.

You’re using the most extreme cases to denounce an act generally. These cases are by their nature more notable and likely to be reported. If you went searching for case examples through more objective means, you’d probably come up with counter examples, where people have grown up into perfectly healthy adults. And even if they regret their former actions, that’s come about because of a society that shuns incest, not necessarily because anything intrinsically wrong came from their experience.

[ArtemisPanthar]

The gut reaction to the mention of incest more often than not is negative,because the first thing that comes to mind is not consensual sex between siblings, it`s adult-child sex.
Difficult to think that this anything to do with "consensual" .

I'm not sure where you're from, but if you mention incest where I'm from the automatic assumption is cousin-cousin relationship, which is probably the most benign example of incest. Cousin-cousin relationships are much more common (among known incidences) acts of incest than sibling-sibling and parent-child.

Of course, perhaps the association varies depending on where you're from.

[bobtheguy]

Actually it's probably more to do the memetic social stigmata from tribal times when it was far more lucid and profitable for your tribe to marry your children off to other tribes so they pay your tribe dowries. This explains why female monkeys teach their children sex as a form of social interaction but female humans do not.

One of Freud's more accessible theories.

that thing about monkeys is gross.
-
-
-

[Wings of Fire]

How remarkably erudite of you.

[Havoc]

This explains why female monkeys teach their children sex as a form of social interaction but female humans do not.

Yet it would be awesome to a degree if they did.

[Wil]

............................



You heard it here first.

[OANST]

Yeah. That was definitely an interesting statement.

[used:)]

I think what he meant is that it could be awesome if mother's encouraged sexual intercourse in their children. Not have it with them. Of course, it's equally likely that he meant the latter.

[OANST]

This is Havoc that we are talking about.

[Anonyman!]

Dear lord. I uhm. UHM. UUUUUUUUUHHHHHHHMMMMMMMMMM.

[Pilot]

I think what he meant is that it could be awesome if mother's encouraged sexual intercourse in their children.

They should have just sent them here instead.

[Wings of Fire]

Havoc is totally oedipal.

[OANST]

Oedipus even sounds like something he would like! It's a motherfucking kitty cat! Literally!