Oddworld Forums > Zulag Two > Off-Topic Discussion


: How did life originate?
Atheistic evolution 13 54.17%
Theistic evolution 3 12.50%
Intelligent design 1 4.17%
Old Earth Creationism 1 4.17%
Young Earth Creationism 0 0%
The universe/life has always existed 2 8.33%
Other (Please state) 4 16.67%
: 24.

 
Thread Tools
 
  #61  
12-05-2006, 12:40 PM
Munch's Master's Avatar
Munch's Master
Outlaw Mortar
 
: Mar 2005
: England
: 1,815
Blog Entries: 20
Rep Power: 22
Munch's Master  (745)Munch's Master  (745)Munch's Master  (745)Munch's Master  (745)Munch's Master  (745)Munch's Master  (745)Munch's Master  (745)

As I've said, my views on evolution are complex. I agree in it prettty much entirely apart from the Man/Ape thing, but since I'm outnumbered 1000000 to 1 at that, I'll surrender that arguement for now.
Life definitely exists on other worlds- they've foudn stuff on mars for instance. Intellignet life is the tougher question. Although I personally think it must exist, and life less, equally and more intelligent than us is everywhere in the unvierse in great numbers. Distances may be too great for travel, but I have long been interested in the Panspermia theory. It is fully possible, but for me to present an argument on that now isn't going to happen because:
a) it's too late- 20 to 10, and I've yet to have tea/dinner.
b) I'd need to gather up some sources first, as my mind can be hazy- I tend to have several miscellaneous thoughts going on at once or close proximity yet not the ones I want to be thinking about.

Anyway, yeah evolution is fact (not gonna put forward my arguement now), yeah there's life far smarter than us elsewhere, yeah they're too faraway to reach us intentionally or don't want to reach us yet, yeah Panspermia is possible but probably wrong.
__________________


Fuzzle Guy: Apart from going swimming I've never been more wet in my life than when I went to see Take That.

Reply With Quote
  #62  
12-05-2006, 01:02 PM
snuzi's Avatar
snuzi
Outlaw Sniper
 
: Nov 2006
: Teh Webz
: 1,515
Rep Power: 20
snuzi  (12)

:
Best stick with "I accept Evolutionary Theory and the Modern Synthesis because that is what the evidence tells us." Belief is incorrect terminology within science.

Though it is fun to answer "no" to creationists when they ask you if you believe in evolution.
Holy freaking crap, could you be any more ignorant?

"Believe" can mean more than one thing, and I just happened to be using it as a synonym for "think". I was expressing an opinion, not acknowledging evolution as a religious belief, damn it.
__________________


Last edited by snuzi; 12-05-2006 at 01:06 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #63  
12-05-2006, 02:48 PM
Nate's Avatar
Nate
Oddworld Administrator
Rainbow of Flavour
 
: Apr 2002
: Seattle (woo!)
: 16,311
Blog Entries: 176
Rep Power: 42
Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)

Yeah, but splitting hairs is fun for the entire family!

:
Life definitely exists on other worlds- they've foudn stuff on mars for instance.
Wrong, actually. They've found some marks in rocks that appeared to be indications of bacteria and amino acids that are necessary for (but do not definitively indicate) life.

:
In recent years speculation has grown again, however—prodded by a study of the ALH84001 Mars meteorite which concluded that it contained fossilized microbes. This explanation was disproved, however, and it was discovered that the worm-like appearance of the fossils was due to the coating of gold on the samples for viewing under a microscope (without the gold it appeared very rough, square, and generally more rock-like). Other scientists have subsequently sought to explain these findings on the basis of chemical processes. Both remain highly controversial within the scientific community. Other Mars meteorites such as the Nakhla meteorite were suggested to have evidence of life also.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_on...odern_findings)
__________________
:
Spending as long as I do here, it's easy to forget that Oddworld has actual fans.

Reply With Quote
  #64  
12-05-2006, 04:00 PM
magic9mushroom's Avatar
magic9mushroom
Sleg
 
: Apr 2006
: Australia
: 677
Rep Power: 20
magic9mushroom  (20)

BM is the definition of non-ignorant.
__________________
:
Why? Why would anybody have any problems with a mad scientist who wants to take over the world, remove Homo sapiens as the dominant species and live forever?

Reply With Quote
  #65  
12-05-2006, 04:14 PM
snuzi's Avatar
snuzi
Outlaw Sniper
 
: Nov 2006
: Teh Webz
: 1,515
Rep Power: 20
snuzi  (12)

Well, apparently not, since he made an idiotic mistake like that.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #66  
12-06-2006, 08:35 AM
Bullet Magnet's Avatar
Bullet Magnet
Bayesian Empirimancer
 
: Apr 2006
: Greatish Britain
: 7,724
Blog Entries: 130
Rep Power: 30
Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)

I was pointing out a use of language that can lead to confusion when discussing evolution and scientific thought. There is a veritable minefield of pitfalls when teaching the subject, so careful use of language is a must in order to connect with people in the right way, and convey your message effectively.

Language is our servant, not our master. Or at least it should be. Sometimes we have to be careful about what we say on these matters. A classic example is the common usage of the word "theory" and the scientific usage. This one misunderstanding (it has descended into pedantics now, as we have drummed it into everyone's skulls) is fuel for some very ignorant arguments.

I wasn't saying that you considered it a religious belief, merely suggesting a better way to express your statement. As I say, "belief" is incorrect terminology in the fields of science.
__________________
| (• ◡•)|  (❍ᴥ❍ʋ)

Reply With Quote
  #67  
12-06-2006, 10:30 AM
snuzi's Avatar
snuzi
Outlaw Sniper
 
: Nov 2006
: Teh Webz
: 1,515
Rep Power: 20
snuzi  (12)

Well, as much as I appreciate the compulsive manner in which you pick apart other people's posts, I feel I must reiterate what I have just said. I did not mean I believed in the sense you are talking about. Once again, I meant that I accept the Theory of Evolution as something that actually occurred.

There. That clear enough for ya pal? Or would you like to perhaps have me translate it too, so that everyone can understand?
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #68  
12-06-2006, 10:38 AM
Bullet Magnet's Avatar
Bullet Magnet
Bayesian Empirimancer
 
: Apr 2006
: Greatish Britain
: 7,724
Blog Entries: 130
Rep Power: 30
Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)

No, you've made yourself quite clear.
__________________
| (• ◡•)|  (❍ᴥ❍ʋ)

Reply With Quote
  #69  
12-06-2006, 10:47 AM
snuzi's Avatar
snuzi
Outlaw Sniper
 
: Nov 2006
: Teh Webz
: 1,515
Rep Power: 20
snuzi  (12)

You're so dense.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #70  
12-06-2006, 11:35 AM
Munch's Master's Avatar
Munch's Master
Outlaw Mortar
 
: Mar 2005
: England
: 1,815
Blog Entries: 20
Rep Power: 22
Munch's Master  (745)Munch's Master  (745)Munch's Master  (745)Munch's Master  (745)Munch's Master  (745)Munch's Master  (745)Munch's Master  (745)

Now you're just name-calling, and discussion or debate isn't name calling. Senseless arguing is name calling. And this is all just a misunderstanding- believe can suggest religious belief/faith ,but also merely an opinion or viewpoint in discussion. It';s just a misunderstanding, let's all forget it and have an nice cup of tea.
Also nate, are you sure about that? I thought they'd found very primitive, slug-like or mollusc-like lifeforms on Mars. But since I can't actually find my source while you can, I'll assume yours is more reliable. I really could do with some reliable sources for this discussion.
__________________


Fuzzle Guy: Apart from going swimming I've never been more wet in my life than when I went to see Take That.

Reply With Quote
  #71  
12-06-2006, 11:41 AM
Bullet Magnet's Avatar
Bullet Magnet
Bayesian Empirimancer
 
: Apr 2006
: Greatish Britain
: 7,724
Blog Entries: 130
Rep Power: 30
Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)

They were shapes in a Martian rock that fell on Antarctica that could have been fossilised bacteria. I don't think they ever established whether they were fossils or ordinary mineralisationa.
__________________
| (• ◡•)|  (❍ᴥ❍ʋ)

Reply With Quote
  #72  
12-06-2006, 05:32 PM
magic9mushroom's Avatar
magic9mushroom
Sleg
 
: Apr 2006
: Australia
: 677
Rep Power: 20
magic9mushroom  (20)

*emerges from behind flame-proof shield*

Let's just forget this shall we?

OnT: All life that may have existed on Mars died a long time ago. What they want to know is whether there used to be life.
__________________
:
Why? Why would anybody have any problems with a mad scientist who wants to take over the world, remove Homo sapiens as the dominant species and live forever?

Reply With Quote
  #73  
12-07-2006, 03:44 AM
Nate's Avatar
Nate
Oddworld Administrator
Rainbow of Flavour
 
: Apr 2002
: Seattle (woo!)
: 16,311
Blog Entries: 176
Rep Power: 42
Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)

:
They were shapes in a Martian rock that fell on Antarctica that could have been fossilised bacteria. I don't think they ever established whether they were fossils or ordinary mineralisationa.
Read my last post. They looked like fossils but ended up being an artifact of the processing of samples.

:
Also nate, are you sure about that? I thought they'd found very primitive, slug-like or mollusc-like lifeforms on Mars. But since I can't actually find my source while you can, I'll assume yours is more reliable. I really could do with some reliable sources for this discussion.
Yes, I'm sure. If there had been anything beyond single-cell organism it would be big news and everyone would know.
__________________
:
Spending as long as I do here, it's easy to forget that Oddworld has actual fans.

Reply With Quote
  #74  
12-08-2006, 03:11 PM
Majic's Avatar
Majic
Ascended Being
 
: Dec 2001
: USA: Dallas, Tx
: 3,298
Rep Power: 26
Majic  (249)Majic  (249)Majic  (249)

:
But my biology teacher has stated we are descended from modern apes, so there you go.
You have a very questionable teacher then. Mine made sure to stamp that misunderstanding out of us the first day of the unit

And to Mojo, awesome reference. You made my day.
Reply With Quote
  #75  
12-08-2006, 08:42 PM
Cullen Heath's Avatar
Cullen Heath
The Oddworld Bazaar
 
: Oct 2005
: .
: 1,983
Rep Power: 0
Cullen Heath  (6)
Happy

:
I'm american and I think it's pretty funny.
Yeah, but it starts getting stupid after a while.

Okay, wouldn't Theistic Evolutionism and Old Earth Creationism be the same thing, basically? What, are you going to say that the universe was created within the past century?

EDIT: Whoa, didn't realize there were 3 pages to this beast.
__________________
Bross.com


Last edited by Cullen Heath; 12-08-2006 at 08:46 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #76  
12-08-2006, 08:49 PM
Bullet Magnet's Avatar
Bullet Magnet
Bayesian Empirimancer
 
: Apr 2006
: Greatish Britain
: 7,724
Blog Entries: 130
Rep Power: 30
Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)

We, along with modern and prehistoric monkeys, hominids, non-hominid apes and simians such as lemurs, are all primates, and modern apes (humans, chimpanzees, gorillas, orangutans and gibbons) are all grouped under the superfamily Hominoidea, which is named after the human groups in the old Linnaean taxonomy system. Me explaining

There is a new classification system out now, Cladistic Taxonomy. Basically, as well as classifying organisms, it also shows how they are related in evolutionary terms, to the best of our knowledge. So all the organisms in one clade are descended from a common ancestor, although on a diagram the common ancestor won't be on the point of the clade- it will be attached to it. It isn't a family tree, it still uses classifications ("taxa", singular: taxon), but it is useful to both see how organisms are related to each other and also organises them into distinct groups. We know how organisms are related using evidence from the fossil record, genetics, and other, more complicated methods.

However, this means that the term "reptile" is no longer scientifically appropriate in the classic sense, because now the clade reptillia* also includes birds and mammals, as they are descended from reptiles.

Wikipedia: Cladististics

This is a fantastic site for the ins and outs of evolution, and clears up alot of confusion and misconceptions, especially the "For teachers" section: http://evolution.berkeley.edu/

*There isn't one, it is separated into such divisions as diapsids and anapsids, based on fundamental differences in skull structure. I used this term for convenience in explaining my point.
__________________
| (• ◡•)|  (❍ᴥ❍ʋ)

Reply With Quote
  #77  
12-10-2006, 10:15 AM
Munch's Master's Avatar
Munch's Master
Outlaw Mortar
 
: Mar 2005
: England
: 1,815
Blog Entries: 20
Rep Power: 22
Munch's Master  (745)Munch's Master  (745)Munch's Master  (745)Munch's Master  (745)Munch's Master  (745)Munch's Master  (745)Munch's Master  (745)

I knew the whol reptillia thing ages ago. I thought the stuff about reptiles being linked to birds and certain mammals was old knews?
Geez, you know so much about biology. And all the fancy words. You're both a walking thesaurus and walking science encyclopedia.
__________________


Fuzzle Guy: Apart from going swimming I've never been more wet in my life than when I went to see Take That.

Reply With Quote
  #78  
12-10-2006, 10:58 AM
Bullet Magnet's Avatar
Bullet Magnet
Bayesian Empirimancer
 
: Apr 2006
: Greatish Britain
: 7,724
Blog Entries: 130
Rep Power: 30
Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)

I am a Marine Biology student.
__________________
| (• ◡•)|  (❍ᴥ❍ʋ)

Reply With Quote
  #79  
12-10-2006, 12:37 PM
snuzi's Avatar
snuzi
Outlaw Sniper
 
: Nov 2006
: Teh Webz
: 1,515
Rep Power: 20
snuzi  (12)

Heh, when it comes to this sorta thing, you could always rely on Bullet Magnet to set the record straight
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #80  
12-10-2006, 12:49 PM
Patrick Vykkers's Avatar
Patrick Vykkers
Right Wing Wanker
 
: Jun 2006
: New Zealand
: 1,466
Rep Power: 19
Patrick Vykkers  (12)

:
Yeah, but it starts getting stupid after a while.

Okay, wouldn't Theistic Evolutionism and Old Earth Creationism be the same thing, basically? What, are you going to say that the universe was created within the past century?

EDIT: Whoa, didn't realize there were 3 pages to this beast.
They are different. Old Earth Creationists generally believe that God still created everything except humans at once (I think), and that evolution didn't happen, and that humans were created recently, but they accept Terra's age of 4.5 billion years. Theistic evolutionists believe God used evolution to create all life.
__________________
Economic Left/Right: 8.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.21
http://www.politicalcompass.org/

Reply With Quote
  #81  
12-11-2006, 08:14 AM
Bullet Magnet's Avatar
Bullet Magnet
Bayesian Empirimancer
 
: Apr 2006
: Greatish Britain
: 7,724
Blog Entries: 130
Rep Power: 30
Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)

Has anyone seen in the news recently about the newly discovered marine species in Antarctica? Great news obviously, but I am horrified by the inaccurate data that every single media outlet in the world has repeated.

They report the species dubbed the "Jurassic Shrimp", being a species of crustacean thought extinct for 50 million years, and is now a living fossil. I'm trying to clear this up, but it's me against the world here: it is not the same species. It is a modern species, no fossil known records it. It is of the same group, previously thought extinct, but evolution has quite clearly occurred. This is a different species from the extinct ones!

This is going to be the coelacanth controversy all over again...
__________________
| (• ◡•)|  (❍ᴥ❍ʋ)

Reply With Quote
  #82  
12-11-2006, 11:35 AM
Munch's Master's Avatar
Munch's Master
Outlaw Mortar
 
: Mar 2005
: England
: 1,815
Blog Entries: 20
Rep Power: 22
Munch's Master  (745)Munch's Master  (745)Munch's Master  (745)Munch's Master  (745)Munch's Master  (745)Munch's Master  (745)Munch's Master  (745)

Since you're so well up on marine biology, I'll ask- Is there any truth to the rumours of the living, undisturbed/undiscovered lifeforms in the udnerwater lake in the antarctic? Only I've heard there's a preserved lake beneath the ice, thought to house 'new' species. Do you know any more about this? (Really drifitng off topic here)
__________________


Fuzzle Guy: Apart from going swimming I've never been more wet in my life than when I went to see Take That.

Reply With Quote
  #83  
12-11-2006, 11:59 AM
snuzi's Avatar
snuzi
Outlaw Sniper
 
: Nov 2006
: Teh Webz
: 1,515
Rep Power: 20
snuzi  (12)

I doubt anyone'd know. The conditions there are too harsh for exploration, especially when it comes to underwater exploration. There might be some truth to it though, since most undiscovered organisms dwell in the ocean's depths (seeing as how it's so vast).
__________________


Last edited by snuzi; 12-11-2006 at 12:02 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #84  
12-11-2006, 01:56 PM
Bullet Magnet's Avatar
Bullet Magnet
Bayesian Empirimancer
 
: Apr 2006
: Greatish Britain
: 7,724
Blog Entries: 130
Rep Power: 30
Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)Bullet Magnet  (8784)

Of course there are undiscovered life-forms down there... but therefor we obviously have no idea what they could be.. Currently we fear drilling down there for the risk of contaminating the lake with surface organisms, risking both the ecosystem and our samples.
__________________
| (• ◡•)|  (❍ᴥ❍ʋ)

Reply With Quote
  #85  
12-11-2006, 06:28 PM
Nate's Avatar
Nate
Oddworld Administrator
Rainbow of Flavour
 
: Apr 2002
: Seattle (woo!)
: 16,311
Blog Entries: 176
Rep Power: 42
Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)Nate  (13497)

Actually, some geologists found something similar in an underwater lake in Israel a few months back.

:
Eight invertebrates new to science have been discovered in an underwater cave in central Israel, which was uncovered during drilling at a quarry close to Tel Aviv.

The largest of these is a white shrimp-like crustacean and another looks like a species of scorpion and is blind.

Scientists say it is a unique ecosystem that has been cut off from the world for five million years and that other ancient life forms may be living there as well.

Dr Hanan Dimantman, a biologist at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, said," We are sure that the eight species that were found are only the beginning of the story of this ecosystem."

The cave connects to a lake and a network of passageways that extend for more than a mile (1.6km) some 400ft (120m) underground and it is thought to date back millions of years to a time when the area was part of the Mediterranean Sea.

Two of the animals live in seawater and two others live in fresh or brackish water, which means they may be descended from ancient sea creatures, the scientists say.

All of the newly discovered species were found alive, except for one type of blind scorpion.
Specimens have been sent to European and Israeli experts in order that the creatures can be named and classified.
__________________
:
Spending as long as I do here, it's easy to forget that Oddworld has actual fans.

Reply With Quote
  #86  
12-11-2006, 07:13 PM
Strike Witch's Avatar
Strike Witch
Laserguns!
 
: Jan 2003
: 気持ちপ
: 4,311
Blog Entries: 246
Rep Power: 28
Strike Witch  (4900)Strike Witch  (4900)Strike Witch  (4900)Strike Witch  (4900)Strike Witch  (4900)Strike Witch  (4900)Strike Witch  (4900)Strike Witch  (4900)Strike Witch  (4900)Strike Witch  (4900)Strike Witch  (4900)

Heh, you want undiscovered mysterious fauna?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongolian_Death_Worm

This sucker good enough?
Reply With Quote
  #87  
12-11-2006, 07:17 PM
Majic's Avatar
Majic
Ascended Being
 
: Dec 2001
: USA: Dallas, Tx
: 3,298
Rep Power: 26
Majic  (249)Majic  (249)Majic  (249)

loles, cryptozoology ftw.

I can't help but think back to that episode of Penn & Teller where they follow the dudes searching for the Loch Ness Monster. The scene where they imitate the duo is priceless.
Reply With Quote


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 








 
 
- Oddworld Forums - -