Well, since my beliefs are unknown to me as yet I'll post what I know and have heard.
1.
:
We {biologists} now belive life does not come spontaniously from non-life
|
"Introduction to cell biology" at DCU, year 1, semester 1.
Inteligent design is a good theory. Evolution is a good theory. Creationism is a good theory (see #2). However, even science does not know where it all began. How cells started is still all theory. Once they got started it's easy to explain dyverse life on earth using ideas like evolution. IE makes sence and can be convincing. Life is damn complex and defies most Chemisty ideals. I would side with evolution, probably because I heard about it first.
However, science has no proof about how life began. There is room for a god.
2.
Science/Physics does not know what happened at the big bang, or before it. There is still room for a god/higher power. Remember, a lot of science is still theory since it cannot be proved conclusivly. It is seen to work and be true, but that is not proof.
3.
Atheism (the belief there is nothing beyond the physical existance) is a religios belief in itself, going by definition. In fact, if you expand it, it can be viewed just like any other belief. Believing in Everything leads to a belief in the beyond {Everything is a very big word, bigger than Universe}. If you can grasp everything affecting everything on a physical level, then you've got a deep understanding.
4.
I was raised Catholic Christian. "The Da Vinci Code", from what I've heard and seen {haven't read it yet} is complete nonsence. It even messes up something as eligent as Phi {a ratio/number that deeper understanding of is explored in some religions}. It misses the point of "The secret dossies" {tracing a priest back to the local kings}. I will watch the movie, and then make a more informed decision, but from what I've seen it really can't stand by itself.
5.
MojoMan220, I partly agree with you. Following religion to the point where you no longer think about actions but just do them to follow is very dangerous. Ultimitly it is down to individuals to realise they are individuals. Religious wars or crusades NOT justifiable.
However, this does not mean religion itself is bad. It is just that people practice it in foolish ways, or twist it for self-gain. This is where it becomes, in my view, wrong.
6.
This was all my opinion, with the exeption of athists being religious which was debated on another forum I browse. I feel I failed to get this point across effectively.