Thanks for that, Khanz. That's actually a brilliant theory, the best alternative to evolution I've ever seen. For clarification, though, what would these 'perfect' specimens have for characteristics? Today, the cats you described are pretty much perfectly suited to their environment, so under what conditions was this perfection aplicable? I er... don't expect you to have been around at the time, but I'm interested nonetheless.
As for organisms developing traits not in the gene pool, I can offer an arguement against that statement. On the other hand, Down's Syndrome is not inherited, not carried in the genome, and can occur with no history of the condition in the family's past. The simple counter arguement to that is that since it's not inherited, it can have no place in evolution.
However, evolution takes many centuries to be recognisable (except in small isolated instances, and on a microcosmic scale) - and humans have not been around to study genes for anywhere near long enough to see a trait occur out of the blue.
The microcosmic scale of which I speak refers to pockets of bacterial organisms. The case I have in mind is of so-called superbugs (the oh-so-informative media won't explain to me what they actually are, since it doesn't take devout religion to be stupid and demand things to be dumbed down). It is feared they will adapt faster to existing treatment if we use that treatment (as those that do survive the treatment will be the only ones left to reproduce). Now, as I said, I don't know the specifics of this, but according to your statement, the resistence for this is already carried in the genome of these 'bugs'. How is it meant to have come about?
Bah, I could probably continue arguing against my own arguements, but I fear that would just lead to a less clearly defined discussion.
|