:
So you're saying that we should never discuss politics or ethical questions because I will be trying to convince you to agree with my views? What about if I see you about to do something potentially dangerous and try to convince you not to do it - would that count as evil control?
|
Constructive discussion requires at least two parties who are willing to engage intellectually, while 'preaching' has a polarizing effect when the other party doesn't want to participate.
What you're talking about in the latter part is suggestion. Short of physically restraining somebody to prevent them from doing something you perceive as 'potentially dangerous' the choice would be as much yours as the other person's to comply or even 'consider' what you say to them.
"evil control" (as you re-emphasize) comes from the extortion involved from giving somebody no other choice but to go along with you. In all fairness, I would never personally subject another into anything they do not
consent to.
What I see in the instance of preaching to somebody that flat out doesn't want to hear it, is that it becomes less about what the preacher wants for others, and more about what he wants for himself.
:
But being preached to is hardly having their will overpowered. Unless they haven't been properly inoculated, I suppose. But that is what happened to the preacher already.
|
Of course it isn't, it seems to me that doing so against another's wishes presents a breach of respect and even contempt for another's values.