I disagree, for me the term anarchist philosophy is certainly an oxymoron here.
Philosophy concerns the underling truth to life, the universe, yeah, and everything. It has no political ties, or social, beyond what is at the heart of existence. The truth is the truth is the truth.
Anarchy is the promotion of disorder, to moral ambiguity, the annihilation of structure, most probably stemming from existentialism.
Anarchist politics, sure. Anarchy being one conclusion to other philosophical concepts, maybe. I don’t believe there is such a thing as anarchic philosophy in any real sense, and I would think philosophers connected to such would baulk at the idea.
EDIT: Although, thinking about it, I can think of several instances where philosophy is directly connected to social constructs. You'll probably remember this better than I can, but didn't Plato have this entire thing whereby there are three different 'types' of soul and these dictate the position and function of a person in society? Worker, warrior, ruler (the philosopher being the ideal)? Or am I thinking of Socrates? I know Aristotle had a similar (the various different souls) system but different as to what they represent (Vegetative, Appetitive...?)
So, philosophy does have ties to politics, I’m just thinking of it in my own more romantic way of what it should be, maybe. In conclusion, anarchist philosophy may exist in your world, but it certainly does not in mine.
