:
Screw Dodos... we need to bring back the Mammoths!
No, seriously, I think that cloning is just messed up. It's unnatural, especially with things that have been long extinc.
And... why Tasmanian Devils? Those slow, agressive creatures are pretty lame, in my opinion.
|
I mainly meant Dod's because they are recently extinct and becasue of human actions, they did not become extinct naturally. And hopefully, people nowadays have a bit more sense not to kill off things that are almost extinct. Well, sort of.
Cloning, lets say, dinosaurs in some ways would be bad. It would at least help us learn more about their behaviour etc., but then they might break out, eat people and they've been extinct for 160,000,000 years. Just an example, I don't think we can clone them, we don't have access to the materials. Jurassic Park was fairly innacurate, the chances of that happening a zillions to 1, if not entirely impossible.
Tasmanian
Tiger. Tasmanian Devils were the creatures that may be used as 'hosts' or whatever for the clone. And just becasue I creature is your opinion 'lame' that doesn't mean we should kill them all off and not care or try to do something about it.
Mammoths became extinct naturally. But what I was thinking is, if a creature nowadays became extinct naturally, people might still think its their fault. Are pandas dying out because of us quite that much? Well, maybe they are, but still, if a species is becoming extinct without much contact with humans ever, it may be unnatural to try to keep the species from extinction if its meant to go extinct.
With the pigeon, it would be a new embryo inside the pigeon. The pigeons body would be incabable of growing it that big inside it. It may be a midget Dodo permanently, or when it hatches it may grow to normal size. Dodo eggs may have been larger than pigeons, but a single Dodo egg instead of multiple pigeon eggs should/could work.
To my knowledge, Tasmanian Devils were closely related enough. I'll ahve to try wikipedia or summat later.