Isn't time we give the old rules an update, I was browsing though and I noticed a few things went unchanged. Such as the avatar size, the rules say it must be 60x60 but mine and most others are clearly 100x100. Aswell as the signatures, I've seen many signatures with an image and more than three lines. It's time to sweep out the old.
__________________
HAPPY HOL-ODD-DAYS!
I bought some powdered water, but didn't know what to add.
__________________ http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/6273/mysig5br.gif
"Why do you have to quote others when you can quote yourself?" (Quote by me)
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God.
You see things, and you say 'why'. But i dream things that never were and i say 'why not'.
I'll see to the updations now. However, about the images per sig rule. That still stands. If you could direct me to those members breaking this rule, please notify me.
“Also, we don't need no Jacob to gay this place up. We have officially won the award for the forum with a highest proportion of gay members whilst not being themed about poojabbing, cowboys or Kylie.” - Nate
That would seem out of place if only one section was bolded. Think about the aesthetics! Just refer to the paragraph, or quote it, when warning all the people you so want to warn
“Also, we don't need no Jacob to gay this place up. We have officially won the award for the forum with a highest proportion of gay members whilst not being themed about poojabbing, cowboys or Kylie.” - Nate
Updating the Rules
Just refer to the paragraph, or quote it, when warning all the people you so want to warn 