:
by saying that the terrorist was worth more as a hostage to the government than a baby, I meant that the government would pay more to have a terrorist as a hostage than a baby, because a baby couldn't give any information about an upcoming terrorist attack while a terrorist can.
-
-
By the way, oddjobabe, I'm just trying to make a point, I'm not trying to insult anyone.
|
I really don't think that example has anything to do with what you were talking about. Your example is situational and does not at all imply that the baby has any less actual worth than the terrorist, but that the terrorist is the one applicable to that situation.
The point is - yes, people do put worth on human life. People think that some people are worth more than others. However, that's perception, that's our desire to classify and rank ourselves. No one really has any more worth than another. We like to think they do, that "we" are better than "they" but if you look, really look, we're all just people.
Afterall, who's the authority on how much a person is worth? Do we give that power to the government simply because we are governed by them? Should it then be OK to dispose of less worthy people? Understand this is the same line of thinking that was/is behind hate crimes against groups of people and mass genocides like the Holocaust.