:
So is Science. It's a way of guessing what's going on and then trying to prove it. Quantum mechanics, Big Bang theory, String theory, M theory, Holographic Universe, Chaos theory... I could go on. Science can complement {and attack} most religious ideas, but it certainly doesn't remove the need for Belief. You either have to trust science, or trust whichever book you consider "The Good Book"
|
The diffrence between religion and science is that science is actualy trying to figure out how everything works and that when they discover something new they come out and say: You know what, we were wrong before, this is how we think it is now.
I never heard the church say anything remotely like that.
Ofcourse things that happened 16 million years ago can't ever be accurate since no-one was there to confirm what happened. But science is based mostly on facts, while religion is pure believe without actualy being able to support an inch of your theory.
The big bang for instance, can't be fully proven, but there are bits and pieces that point out that something to that effect must have taken place. While the Adam and Eva story for example, can't be supported by anything but a book.
But the entire point to my remark was this: Religion is like an excuse because if you are to ask a religious person why his 17 year old brother bought a gun, messed around with it and got himself killed with it, he will probably answer something along the lines off: It was gods will. And that in my opinion is hiding from the fact that his brother was a f*cking moron who managed to shoot himself. Unless ofcourse, god wants all of us to shoot ourselfs in the head with a twin barrel shotgun.