I watched Conspiracy Theory. Just a month or two ago, in fact, so the evidence it presented is still reasonably fresh in my mind.
:
|
2. We have never gone back to the moon since, why is that?
|
Because there has been no need to. It's really out of character for me to defend the American Government, but they did have a very good reason for getting to moon before the Russians - or was that itself the reason...whatever, there has been no need since. Of course, the Russians realised that it was impossible to get to the moon with the technology of that time and ceased efforts.
:
|
3. The spaceship never made a crater in the moon (it should have).
|
Interestingly, NASA claims it wouldn't have - which just goes to show how desperate they are. Any person with even a rudimentary understanding of the way the world works knows full well there's going to be a crater. Even the scientific sketches of the landing show a crater.
:
|
4. The crosshairs on the photos taken on the moon were under certain entities (not sure what it means exactly).
|
I couldn't quite understand what Tom was getting at, so I'll wait for that to be clarified. The point is, the cameras that were being used had crosshairs on the lens that are shown on the developed pictures, sort of like guidelines. They are always on top of everything in the picture, yet these ones are
covered by objects such as the astros and the buggy and whatnot. For any person who studies faked photos and films, this is a very obvious indication that these objects have been superimposed.
:
|
7. There’s a satellite photo of area 51 that shows off an area with many craters.
|
The point here is that these craters match exactly the crater formation of the area that the Eagle landed. True, they could have been used as test areas, but why all the trouble getting it so exact? And how come the hangers at Area 51 look like stage hangers, like the ones you get in Hollywood? Not a persuasive arguement by itself, I know.
:
|
What about the fact that there were no stars whatsoever in that entire moon landing documentary.
|
That's true also. Sunlight would not block the light coming from other stars, because the Moon hasn't got the right atmosphere for that to happen. It's possible it hasn't got an atmosphere at all, but I can't remember.
Other points of interest:
1. Looking at the photos, the shadows of the rocks point in a variety of directions, but there is only one source of light on the moon - the Sun.
2. There is a famous photo of an astro with the sun behind him, and yet we can see the features of his suit. In the real world, he would be silhouetted.
3. More photo evidence, of an astro coming out of the Eagle and into its shadow. And yet we can see both him and the shadowed side of the Eagle in perfect detail. Where is this light coming from in each of these three cases? Studio lights are the only answer.
4. Many of the photos and films that were supposedly taken a way away from each other show exactly the same landscape. A mistake? Like the one with the Eagle in the background, and a later photo where it has disappeared? No.
5. If you double the speed of the films, you can see very clearly that the astros and the buggy are travelling as they would under a gravity of 1G.
6. All of the people involved in the mission who doubted it would succeed or who claimed it was a rouse dies under very shady circumstances.
A Japanese satellite is travelling towards the moon, and will take photos of the area the Eagle supposedly landed in two years time. If the Eagle is not there, we will know for certain. If it is, the man in Conspiracy Theory promises to say no more about it other than to accept that he was wrong.
And just for the record, I believe the whole thing to be faked.
Moon Landing= Big Hoax... Seriously
conspiracy
