:
You won't convert anyone that way.
|
who said i am trying to convert someone?
i am just making my beliefs clear
@ T-nex: no HE is a HE , as HE reffered to HIMself in quar'aan.
@ Havoc: no it's very rational... (i am lazy so i'll just pick some parts from a wikihow page ^^)
look for life where it has no known cause, no design and no plan. Life is an action, and an action needs a cause. Would you expect life without a cause or plan? Is there much probability?
If the universe were created by chance (without intelligence), then what power does time and chance have? Chance has no creative ability, since it is just a concept of ratios; probability has no power; it is merely a number like: zero or infinitesimally small, or 99.9%. So, if there were no cytoplasmic life in billions (thousands of millions) of years, then what chance is there of success by adding similarly 1000s of millions of years still without a cause, design or plan and so to form reproductive living cells.
Do you feel that lucky? So did mother nature get so lucky that she created life without a plan, without sterile lab conditions and with no previously existing organic materials?
Life comes from life. That is all we know: scientifically it has not been proven beyond a doubt how cells began. No, DNA and RNA couldn't make it very far with no cell in which to operate, no organelles, no nucleus, no food, no biological energy, no organization? Having no place or way for life to begin is as good as saying it could not reasonably happen...
Poof! and "Oh, it was just there." makes no sense at all. So what if DNA took millions of years to develop, then it still needed an enclosed environ (a cell) and organelles (cell parts)... But if there is a God - an all powerful God would have the power to create something out of nothing, not because of any preconceived or preeminent matter, but because the all powerful God can do that by definition!
could static electricity or an electrical flash of lightning like an explosion near a puddle such as a tidal pool cause the initializing of mitochondrial energy creation, "purposeless" living cells that would then automatically begin digestion, and of course reproduction, to somehow achieve "genetic programming of uniqueness" but still be the same in multitudes of meaningful ways, programming of instincts and immune system, healing of injuries, nerves, nerves cooperating, nerves communicating, autonomic life processes (automated) like respiration, hundreds or millions of interrelated reactions and systems,...
Look at how nature breaks down things and think about whether creation of life seems natural! The 2nd. Law of Thermodynamics states that all things are wearing down. Nature is about breaking down rocks to pebbles and to sand, dissolving, oxidizing, mineral deposits, poison, corrosion, erosion, and rot. If that is true, then how could evolution be true? Evolution is still a theory (even after almost 200 years), meaning that is is not proven, and it can't be proven because it contradicts a law. God can override laws as he wishes, after all, He made laws and is not bound by them.
cheap rip off from an article on wikihow, but it sounds very rational to me.