:
Which will hopefully clear up my slight agrivation with it's two precursors
|
What was wrong with them? They seemed to follow the suit of the first three films. The only problem I see with the newest two are that most of the fans are now no longer children.
On the note of the newer films, I still can't get over the complexity of the plot for The Phantom Menace... bearing in mind it's really a kid's film, the crux seems to be a duplicitous trade blockade, instigated covertly by an ambitious politician, against a fairly innocent planet acting as the underpinning vehicle for said ambitious politician to discredit the party leader, then usurp him. Meanwhile as an ironic counterpoint the self-same blockade acts as the catalyst to reconcile and unit the two peoples of this innocent planet, seemingly with the effect of saving the day. The final irony of the major plot being that the blockade's objective was never trade based in the first place and amply succeeded in its political aims.
Whilst this all unveils, the government's peace-keeping representatives discover a promising young boy who they choose to train as one of them, under the shadow of an ominous evil agent sent to the planet for little purpose other than dramatic effect.
Compared to "A New Hope":
The baddies have built an evil giant space station, and a gifted farm boy, trained by a wizard, blows it up. A lovable space pirate helps.
If anything, the original films seem to have even more lame dialogue and directing; not to turn this into a Star Wars thread, of course.