You fucking fail, Dix.

Also Wing was too preachy.

Do you mean military vehicles? or regular cars and trucks?

Oh yes, still loved it to bits though.
Duo fangirl <3<3<3

I liked the dub more, Scott McNeill is an excellent Voice Actor. He also does Ali in Gundam 00, so <3 all around.

There's already Power Armor mockups.

I still don't get what you were saying....

And Big dog.

Biiiiiiiiiiig Dooooooooog

FUCK
FINE
IF A ROBOT IS DRIVING A MILITARY VEHICLE
IT WILL NOT FLEE OUT OF FEAR
IT WILL NOT HAVE ANY HUMAN DEATHS WHEN IT BLOWS UP
IT WILL BE FAR MORE ACCURATE

COOOOOOOOOCKS

Too bad its more expensive :\

yes, but it costs more than humans, does not have a motive to survive, can not be reasoned or negotiated with, and If it does not flee out of fear, then that is a disadvantage, If it doesn't have fear then it will charge into battles that it has no chance of winning. And it can "glitch", and start killing the wrong people.

This isn't really gonna happen you know. They will probably make something like "Microsoft Windows Brain Reader", where you think and it outputs the complete opposite.

Can't put a price on human life.
Someone's been watching far too many Super Robot shows... an AI would have survival as its prime directive, that's pretty good motive.
But you can negotiate with it's master.
No, it won't because of a little thing called logic.
The chances of a computer system glitching to change target are pretty close to 0%, no matter what movies tell you. It'd probably have glitched into shutdown first.

1.a human's life can be priced, but it depends on who they are and how important they are.
2.I hate shows about robots that malfunction and take over the world, besides even if I did, I don't have cable so there isn't much cartoon robot shows on my T.V. also what would that motive be? so that it can serve another 10 years working in the military blowing up people and not getting paid.
3.In some situations you don't have time.
4.I guess your right on that.
5.Yes but even if it didn't malfunction and confuse the target, it could accidently open fire on it's team without trying.

Right. We're gonna make HURRDURR IMMA COMPUTER MACHIEH

PEWPEWPEW

IMMA CHARGE ENEMY FORCES HURRDURR HURRDURR

Plus, not every vehicle needs it's own computer. They could all be wireless connected or someut.

I fucking dispute this.

it's true, who do you think would be worth more to the world, a hobo (not the moderator named hobo) or the president?

It's not fucking true. If I came across a hobo, and he was a nice enough person, I would deem him as worthy of living as anyone else. You're fucking wrong. Do you have no respect for human life? Do you have any respect for any kind of life?

okay, but I mean who would be more important to have a hobo who was mean and stupid, or a president who was nice and smart

Stop confusing definitions.

you cant just lump them into different categories BTG. life's more complicated than that.

I don't think anyones understanding my point here.......

Because your point is flawed and fucked up.

Listen. People are all equal. At least, they should be. You can't put a value on life just because of a person's class or position. It does not work like that. Not in the slightest.

no, it's not, okay I'll try to make one more comparison, who do you think the government would pay more to have as a hostage, a terrorist who was planning to blow-up the white house or a baby who had just been born ,and had no connection with terrorists. definately a terrorist.

What the fuck are you on about?

Alright, I'll put a value on you. You'll be either working class or middle class. Because of your views, I'm going to say middle class. You don't seem to have very strong morals, and you can't figure out where the shift key is. You come to about a fiver.

By worth more, you mean the one who has most money right. Like Bill Gates compared to Tom, Dick and Harry. Bill Gates is worth more in that situation, but some how I feel that's not what your trying to get at...

Bill Gates wouldn't be worth more, Joshkrz. He's simply be more wealthy.

I was asking if he meant that.

I misread your post. It is my blunder, and I apologise.

No problem, its late anyway and I know I don't think straight at this time.

It's not about it changing targets, it's about whether it's all that good at differentiating enemy targets from friendly ones.

Like in WWII when the Russians trained dogs by putting food underneath tanks, then put them on to the battlefield with TNT strapped to their backs in the hope that they'd run to the German tanks and explode. Except that the dogs didn't recognise the German tanks and instead turned around and ran towards to the Russian tanks with which they'd been trained.

You clearly haven't had all that much contact with big business or bureaurocrats. You certainly can put a cost on human life; how much will the lawsuit cost you if things go wrong? Also, how much will it cost you in negative reputation and lost sales? It's worth it to spend up to that amount but no more ensuring that things don't go wrong.

by saying that the terrorist was worth more as a hostage to the government than a baby, I meant that the government would pay more to have a terrorist as a hostage than a baby, because a baby couldn't give any information about an upcoming terrorist attack while a terrorist can.
-
-
By the way, oddjobabe, I'm just trying to make a point, I'm not trying to insult anyone.

I really don't think that example has anything to do with what you were talking about. Your example is situational and does not at all imply that the baby has any less actual worth than the terrorist, but that the terrorist is the one applicable to that situation.

The point is - yes, people do put worth on human life. People think that some people are worth more than others. However, that's perception, that's our desire to classify and rank ourselves. No one really has any more worth than another. We like to think they do, that "we" are better than "they" but if you look, really look, we're all just people.

Afterall, who's the authority on how much a person is worth? Do we give that power to the government simply because we are governed by them? Should it then be OK to dispose of less worthy people? Understand this is the same line of thinking that was/is behind hate crimes against groups of people and mass genocides like the Holocaust.

Don't program the computer to be stupid. Fuck, put anti-shootme chips in the soldiers if the machine goes retard.

the middle part of what you are saying is almost exactly what I was trying to say this whole time.
i know where the shift key is. i use it all the time. especially at the beginning of sentences.
and how is everyone who is middle class supposed to be like what you just described. just because we have good jobs doesn't mean were bad. also the shift key is a good key.

Way to not fucking capitalize while you try to make a point about how you capitalize. Unless you're trying to be ironic or something. Still, fail.



ALSO


You're not bad because you're middle class. You're bad because you're a bad middle class. Savvy?

how am i bad?

You're a Powerglove?

I dispute this.

And by the way, many, many working class people have great jobs. We're just as good as the middle class.

CAPSLOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL

Anyway, I think that the success or failure of Artificial Intelligence systems in a military role is their ability to A. tell friend from foe and B. be able to figure abstract concepts out.

When I type in all caps, I hold the shift button down. Capslock is for pussies.