It’s certainly an idea to hand out awards based on statistics such as ‘Highest poster of 2008’ or ‘Most frequently present’, but assuming no ties there can only ever be one recipient of each award, because each title comes with a winner whose superiority in that field is matter of look-upable fact. The awards are really about voting on your fellow members for more subjective awards. Still, if Peter were to give me database access I’d be more than happy to dish out some stats-based honours.
Categories should also focus on users and their contribution to the Forums. ‘Best hair’ has nothing to do with posting here. Besides, Bullet Magnet would win ‘Best hair’ because he has the best hair. That is in your precious database, sirs.
|