:
See, I took his meaning to be that the captors are worse than the detainees.
|
In some ways they are. The detainees have not been convicted, and the corner that the US has painted itself into means they never will be. America has not been consistent in its prosecution of its "war" on terror, and Guantanamo Bay is the focus point of the consequences. The problem is this: if you treat them as criminals then it is only a law and order question, you are not fighting a war. But if you are fighting a war then these are enemy soldiers, which means you cannot try them as criminals. What we get is people being held as criminals but being prepared for a military tribunal. If they ever get to that point they will be able to say "thank you for admitting that I am a soldier" when the whole point is that the Geneva convention says that they're not because they target civilians. Extraordinary rendition is not allowed and neither can they be returned to their country of origin in case they are mistreated by their own governments (would that be worse, I wonder?). Which leaves two other options: take no prisoners or let them all go.
The situation is utterly impossible in every respect and they should have seen this coming to begin with.
We end up with a situation where people are effectively being indefinitely detained with no legal rights whatever, under brutal conditions in which torture is the order of the day. We all know that torture does not get you reliable intelligence, it just gets you information that the captive thinks you want to hear with no way to verify it. Even an innocent captive will incriminate themselves and spin a wild tale of intrigue and manoeuvres to make the pain go away, and with enough such experiences may actually come to believe their own fabrications. Of course, without trials we have no idea if there are innocent people in there are we are not allowed to find out.
Ultimately we have people holding a great deal of power over other individuals and breaking both national and international law to which they are signatories and we have only their word that it is justified and absolutely nothing preventing any one of us from being put in their ourselves.
I think that maybe those who claim to be on our side in this are worse because we hold them to a higher standard and they deliberately fail to meet it. And I doubt there are many crimes that those detained are accused of that our own militaries have no themselves committed by some means in the prosecution of their various wars, and as we have seen, those on our side who expose such crimes are quickly silenced and imprisoned themselves.
Honestly, I'd not feel safe in the company of either faction. But only one faction already has power over my life.