Metal Gear Solid 2 is a long game? Thats a new one
Ok, so it may seem long, but skip all those cutscenes and Intercom converations and you've got yourself a game that can be completed in no more than 5 hours. Say, 1 or 2.
Its not a bad game however... I too love a good story.
But Splinter Cell will be 10 times better than Metal Gear Solid 2
As for fighting games... the only reason why they are the same is because they always copy each other rather than coming up with their own ideas. take Dead Or Alive 3. It was the first side on fighting game where you could knock your opponent into interactive environments (not including Power Stone 2 of course, as its rather different). In steps Tekken 4 (to add to the poor unentertaining Tekken series) to copy just about everything Dead Or alive 3 gives, including the memorable "smashing through neon lights" scene. But what it fails to copy is the speed and entertainment of Dead Or Alive 3 that makes Tekken 4 "Just another poor Tekken game".
Now take Tao Feng... you can knock your enemies into the walls like on Dead Or Alive 3... but they've improved this alot. They do extra damage and can cripple themselves as you knock them itno breakable walls, you can use the environment to peform even cooler moves, attacks always cause different effects, characters bleed, bruise and get their clothes torn, 4 players on screen at one time and much more.
Games are fun if they have at least some originality in them and are different. I wouldn't buy Madden 2003 if its exactly the same as Madden 2002 with some minro improvements on graphics and updated teams. I wouldn't but Smackdown: Shut Your Mouth if its just exactly the same as every other Smackdown title out there with just better graphics and new wrestlers... hell, I wouldn't buy Smackdown at all... let alone go near anything to do wit hthe WWE!