So
this happened as most of you probably heard. And the good old gun debate is back on every street corner. One of the few responses from the NRA was that "if everyone in that theater would have carried a handgun, the shooter would not have been able to take so many lives".
And it's not the first time such an argument has been raised, I hear it time and time again. And at first it even seemed like a valid argument. If someone walks in with a bunch of weapons, having weapons handy yourself at least evens the odds.
But then I got to thinking on this particular situation. You're in a crowded movie theater and you hear shots go off. You get up, reach for your gun wanting to be the hero who saves the day and get off a couple of rounds at the guy. But meanwhile a few rows below you another guy has the same idea, only he doesn't see the shooter in the back of the theater. He only sees you shooting at someone. Now multiply that mixup by 20 or so people carrying weapons in a crowded theater and the resulting bloodbath would probably have been bigger than what happened now.
So would it really be a safer place if every single person was carrying a gun on them? It might, but that entire idea assumes that everyone who owns a gun is able to handle a gun. It assumes that person has some kind of military-ish experience and is able to analyze a situation before pulling the trigger. 9 out of 10 gun owners simply don't have that sort of experience or training. When they hear a gun go off, panic kicks in and things get ugly when a panicked person has a loaded gun.