Why invest in the facilities when they continue to operate adequately, when you can just keep things going as is and make more profit? Of course, running the place to breaking point would IRL cost more than regular upkeep, but Gluks tend to focus on short term gain.
Bear in mind it's in the third world too. I'm sure many companies invest the bare minimum in their property and just about manage to stay afloat. Case in point- most landlords
![Tongue](images/smilies/d_tongue.gif)