:
I am just waiting to here some politically correct dipstick individual out there saying, "Giant insects? thats not correct it can't happen in movies!"
|
First of all, f
uck you.
Second, who ever sad giant insects couldn't exist in movie? Anything can exist in a fictional movie, but I never said anything about bugs. You start by wrongfully assuming that I can't tell dromaeosaurs from insects, then base other arguements on that.
:
Those were not raptors, they were giant insects.
|
Who would be stupid enough to mistake bugs for dinosaurs? Oh, I can draw things with excruciating detail, but I can't tell an insect from a dromaeosaur. Right, that's some great use of logic, PA. Bravo.
PA, there are so many other dinosaur fans besides me who are sick of seeing them "Jurassic Park-ized" for movies, and there's nothing wrong with me wanting to see dinosaurs portrayed as something besides monsters.
The "It's just a movie" line has thrown at me before, and I always retalliate with the same arguement.
"There are paleoartists who can portray dinosars as fearsome, photogenic, AND accurate at the same time. Why can't movies do that?"
Nobody ever consults people like Brett Booth or Todd Marshall to do the concept art. These people can make dinosars look realistic AND menacing at the same time.
What is so f
ucking wrong with wanting to see a dromaeosaur with feathers?
That's not irony. If he had said it before I posted, then it would have been.
Look, what the f
uck? I say something about the dinosaurs yet again being portrayed innacurately in a movie, and I get lobbed with insults from MojoMan and PA.
Mojo, I thought we had a truce. What happened to that?
Thanks a f
ucking heap, guys. I guess I can't have my own opinions anymore.