:
What "THOSE CHICKENS LOOK SLIGHTLY TOO REAL" bias?
|
There is no such bias. Some fans hate the look of Clakkers, Grubbs and Live Ammo, and are quite happy to be vocal about it. Other fans perceive this to be an attack on SW itself, but I know of no such fan who is so shallow. It's a long-standing misunderstanding that has earned a lot of people a lot of flak, and I'm upset it still exists.
:
Thanks. Isn't that better and shorter way to say what do you think?
|
Not really. It lacks the subtlety and nuances of how I actually feel. I simplified it merely to aid your comprehension.
:
The idea was to base them on animals that lead meaningless, banal lives, hence the chickens.
|
:
If you've ever fully observed a chicken's life in a pen, you can see where they drew their inspiration to use them.
|
The same is true for
any animal trapped in a pen. Chickens and pigs are damn cool if you let them be free.
:
And they only appear to be chicken like.
|
I find it hard to believe that people can't discern the difference in inspiration between a Clakker and, say, a Scrab. Scrabs have a definite crustaceous feel to them, and a behaviour remeniscent of large predator mammals, but you couldn't look at it and say “It's just a damn crab,” or “It's a lion. What's to be impressed by?” Clakkers are fat anthropomorphic chickens with exaggerated hick attitudes. It doesn't matter how many feathery lumps you stick on them, they're still just redesigned poultry.