:
Like I said before, yes it goes against nature. I won't deny that. But that doesn't mean it's by definition morally wrong. The human race has done more things then I can count that go directly against nature so I don't think this is a big matter. Personally I find shooting animals for fun instead of food and stuff a worse case of going against nature then having sex with one and letting it live...
Havoc
|
I agree. There have been worse things that we as humans have done to other humans. I don't think this can be defined as
morally wrong, since, as Havoc said, the animal might not have anything against the act, and may even enjoy it. If it's not hurting anyone, then it can't possibly be
morally wrong.
And what's more, Bitter Buffalo, there would never be half-man, half-tigers. As I've said before, you can't interbreed with another phyla of the animal kingdom. Humans can only mate with humans to create offspring. If a human were to amte with, let's say, a tiger, then nothing would happen as a result, as the DNA of a human and tiger are not similar enough to create an offspring. However, if you were to take a horse and a donkey, a mule would be their offspring, since their DNA is indeed similar enough to create an offspring. However, the consequences of the two animals mating is that the mule is rendered infertile, and cannot produce any offspring as a result.