:
Yay! I am not alone anymore. And cats too, you just made my day ![Happy](images/smilies/d_happy.gif) . Ver courageous of you to just step out like that, I commend you for that.
|
Aw, how awfully sweet of you to say ^^ Certainly made
my day, reading that.
Okay, for the past
two pages, I've seen them taken up by approximately 90% of two things: furry fandom, which no one has apparently anything against, and an enormous number of posts regarding OANST's rift with Snuzi.
My two cents on furry fandom:
Completely delusional. It's almost like fantasizing about sex with a
dragon. What the f
uck? It's never going to happen. It may be an art form, but if you're saying that you like furries more than humans, that, in my eyes, is indeed very strange. Plus, if you want to mix animals with humans and keep neither in their true form, there has to be some sort of magnetism to animals, or otherwise you wouldn't be doing it. Therefore anyone who looks at yiffy porn and says that they have no sexual attraction to animals is in for a long round of introspection.
I agree with Havoc...If the animal has nothing against it, and there is some sort of
bond between the two, I consider it acceptable. If you're just raping some cow to jack off, though, I think that's totally wrong.
:
You know, someone could logically argue for zoophilia (or whatever) and make a bunch of valid points, I'm sure, but at some point you just instinctively know when something is just plain wrong. You know. Like committing murder.
|
Thing is, most zoophiles (I'm really speaking for myself here, I'm only guessing that most) realize that what they're doing is wrong. I never believed that having a sexual attraction to animals is
right or
moral in any way. I know it's wrong, but there's really no way I can quench those feelings.
:
I know eactly what you mean. Kids these days, for some reason, feel that chosing to be gay or bi, will assist them in gaining popularity or friends, or will be a means of rebelling against their parents and establishing themselves as "individuals". They view it as a choice, whether than a work of nature. It just really angers me, since they try to fit into every stereotype that has to do with their chosen sexuality, thereby insulting actualy homosexuals who have been gay, bi, or lesbian from the start.
Perhaps certain people can do the same thing when it comes to zoophilia, and make themselves like it in order to fit into that group. I really wouldn't be surprised.
|
As a matter of fact, that really does happen. Unfortunately, I have firsthand experience in it. A couple weeks after I told a friend of mine about being a zoophile, she started getting all "interested" in dragons and would make comments like "That's a sexy dragon", just like I sometimes said, "Gawd that sexy lion!".
...Copycat...
I see no reason for her to do it though, since, you know, in our quiet little town I'm guessing there are few, if any, zoophiles at all and she wouldn't be doing it to gain popularity.
However, I agree with the noncomformity factor, that sometimes, you just want to stand out from the crowd and be seen as something very unique and unusual, and that's okay, but when you use zoophilia to do it, it gets...weird. You actually turn more people against you that look up to you in awe.
And like Havoc said (again), I wouldn't really call zoophilia a sexual orientation because
most -- I did say
most -- zoophiles still retain an attraction to their own species.