Oooooh dear. So it has come to this. The Evo/ID war. There's a parody of it on film soon:
A Flock of Dodos. But it would do better in another thread. A long, exhausting, full-of-old-news thread (I am rather tired of this argument).
For ease of writing I'm going to restrict this to the science-Christianity argument.
It has been long established by most rational and thinking Christians that the theory of evolution is no problem to their faith. It is important not to take the Bible literally, or you will have to run and hide from the contradictions in it. Even one of the Popes (they do seem to blur together sometimes) has given evolution grace in the church.
Link
Even those who do not accept evolution agree that creationism and ID should not be taught in science class.
However, it is becoming ever clear that for those against evolution, it is no longer about faith, but about the challenge to old traditions, and the beleived effects on their lives. This precipitates as the old Darwin-bashing. And a large part of the support that ID gets is down to the people involved, and/or the observer's perception them. The local, smiley, have-a-beer-with-friends, "normal" proponent of ID seems far more appealing than the scientists, seen to "look down on intellectual inferiors" and use big words. This, and the general way science is taught everywhere, are symptoms of a bigger problem for science today, and a source of ever increasing "magical thinking".
And remember, scientists started out as devout religious people trying to find out about God's world, and trying to make it easier to understand. However, the need for God phased out of many with the discoveries, and eventually science made it
harder to understand the universe, with things like quantum and string theory. Christianity seems to be the only religion that sees the universe as something that can be understood, that has a distinct purpose, as opposed to many other faiths, in which the "creator" and its intentions are entirely unfathomable.
Link