Faults in Pascal's Wager(NOT THIS SHIT AGAIN!)
In the Penses Pascal wrote that it is impossible to truly know God so you have no clue how he chooses to deal with people. He could just not give a **** and not reward anybody. He could only punish on earth and do nothing after you die. Hey, God is unknowable to us, who is to say that he won't only reward people who constantly wear long johns or go commando. Even sicker is that he might reward true evil doers. Or, bizarre as it may seem, a deity can be thought up as rewarding atheists and agnostics for being questors and intellectually honest. Point being, belief is not enough.
Second point, does anybody know how many deities there are? Mankind has created well over 3000. Even being very, very kind to the Wager and saying that their is a lap-over of 100 that means there are 30 deities that you have to pick between. This "argument" is centuries old and has been utterly demolished time and time again and yet it keeps coming back. 20 minutes in the library's philosophy section or surfing the web should be enough to show you that the argument, and by extention the wager, is worthless.
__________________
R.I.P. H.S.T.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab04c/ab04c61afcdd2aa4708641aeeae5cd1d768ca499" alt=""
I wanna have El Scrabino's man babies.
|