I'm debating; I'm having fun talking about a twenty-year-old franchise.
It's why we're all here. I can really do without the incessant, passive-aggressive attacks. Instead of saying I'm "putting [my] fingers in [my] ears and humming to [myself]", offer your argument and we can discuss the franchise we both love, regardless of our individual head-canons.
:
The "evidence" that Sask and Lulu worked at a slaughterhouse in that interview was a hypothetical situation ... to explain the mechanic of assisting Lulu throughout the game. Nowhere else in canon, or concept is this situation mentioned.
|
:
There's just more concrete evidence to the contrary.
|
Yet the only in-universe evidence alludes to Lulu and Sask working at a slaughterhouse rather than Flub Fuels, as per the
New 'n' Tasty intro scene.
:
If that's the case then surely you should take his authority on the fact that his 14 year old self isn't the most reliable source for this, especially when he states that in the exact same post as some kind of act of universal cognisance.
|
Lanning's interview attests to everything Wil said. I'm siding with 14-year-old Wil/Lanning on this one.
:
It just seems as though your point rested on a very flimsy hypothetical.
|
What theory isn't flimsy and hypothetical though? It's Oddworld, not Tolkien's
Lord of the Rings. We don't have an appendix and 5,000 pages of world history to decipher; we have five games—one of them a remake—and about an hour's worth of raw cinematic story. We do, however, have dozens, if not hundred, of lore-heavy interviews, which have also blatantly stated that Lulu and Sask work in a slaughterhouse.
:
Please understand the importance of the winky face. I was only Joshing.
|
It seemed sardonic. I apologise.