I'm currently reading about the version differences and the circumstances of making the movie. This is interesting:
:
In the renegade version, a documentary following the film has the filmmakers explain why the original theatrical release contradicted the first film. According to them, the inflation in Argentina had risen so high during filming that the film's insurance company started to take creative control, and made a film they thought would make the most money.
'Christopher Lambert' was so disgusted with the re-written script that he wanted to drop out of production, but due to contractual obligation he was forced to finish the film.
During the course of filming Christopher Lambert cut his finger to the bone in the first sword fighting scene and Michael Ironside dislodged his jaw in the dome fight.
The director disliked the theatrical cut so much, he left the premiere after only 15 minutes.
|
There are many things in original H2 script that make me believe the script made sense and would made a good movie if the Argentinian Insurance Company didn't mess it all up
Example:
:
The original script explained very clearly why Conner and Ramirez were immortal on Earth when they were sentenced.
JUDGE : I sentence you to exile from Zeist. You will be transported to the planet Earth. Each of you to a different time and place. There to be reborn. Once you have grown to the age you are now, time itself will take on a new meaning for you. One year on Earth is like one day on our planet. So on Earth you will be immortal. Furthermore, your memory of this planet and your lives here will be gone. Until the time of the Gathering. (Page 9 of the HIGHLANDER II script)
|
Retcon? Yes. But it explains why MacLeod and Sean Connery acted like they didn't know each other in the first movie. The second movie doesn't explain that at all.
Edit: Here's the original script:
http://www.joblo.com/arrow/highlander_2.pdf
It makes more sense than the movie.