No matter how many people say it was a conspiracy, and no matter how many people say it wasn't, neither is fully believable. It's not like the explainations on that site should be given any more credibility then the ones on conspiracy websites. Because those sites claim they have interviewed experts as well, just like the ani-conspiracy sites have. So how are we to know who is right and who is not?
One thing I didn't see adressed were the lightposts outside the pentagon, and the passport of one of the terrorists they found in the WTC rubble.
All the lightposts infront of the pentagon were nacked over, because the plane flew over the freeway as it hit the pentagon. However, when a plane flies at that speed and the wing hits a steel pole such as a lightpost, the wing would shred apart. Especialy if it hits a dozen in a row.
And the passport story is my favorite. They actualy found one of the terrorists passports, almost completely intact, in the rubble of the WTC. So let me get this straight, the solid steal beams that were specialy coated (though not up to standards) with fire resisting foam, gave way under the intense flames. But a standard issue PAPER passport, manages to withstand a huge blazing fire that a crashing jet would have caused?
I dunno who to believe at this point, but I know that the passport story is the biggest bullshit I have ever heard.
__________________
The Oddworld Wiki
When one person suffers from a delusion it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called religion.
|