:
My friend, sometimes understanding does not come by "solid" or "scientific" means.
|
Yeah, thanks for the patronising register, son.
You've given the same 'truths' that religion declares, prescribing complicated realities to personal testimony. I'm not saying you're wrong - though something this bizarre
deserves to be wrong - but you've put a lot of faith in such a convoluted story. Doesn't your sense of judgment urge you to seek greater confirmation for something
:
one cannot see/touch/taste/hear or smell in the here and now
|
beyond 'evidence' that you alone find plausible?
:
nor...would [it] even make sense to you or anybody else but me
|
Well, privilileged as you are with this tome of infinite knowledge, perhaps you'll be willing to answer my earlier question regarding the motives of this alien race. I'll ask a third time:
WHY would these aliens abandon their efforts to prevent nuclear war when 9/11 drew us towards this same threat?
Forget this pointless argument on 'truth'. I'm asking you to rationalise the foolish nature of a decision these hyperintelligent aliens have made. We can't prove their existence - that's a given - but we can universally assess the nature of their supposed actions as foolish or not.
I'm questioning the nature of this intelligence, NOT the nature of your beliefs. Even if we assume that your story is correct, its logic is undermined by the prospect that these aliens have made a foolish oversight. How can your genius ETs dismiss the prospect of the very NUCLEAR WAR they are supposed to PREVENT?