:
|
"I didn't know that you were homosexual, drakan."
When I said we, I was refering to guys,
And you dont know anything about me anyway ':-I
|
Except that you're a high and mighty whiney hypocrite?
You seemed to think that you knew an awful lot about me in the Overrated thread. You were making all kinds of statements about how I feel, what I believe, and what I think. All of them incorrect.
:
|
Really? I don't mean to be crude, but I have been circumcised, and have no trouble ejaculating whatsoever. My father was circumcised, and still fathered two children. I'm afraid it's rather obvious that it is you who is in the dark...unless I am a figment of my own imagination.
|
I am not in the dark, Nepharski, you simply misread what I said. SOME people, not ALL people. Although it is definately evident that the foreskin is not always a requirement for ejaculation, there are a considerable number of cases where it has been recorded that it is a requirement. Since the male orgasm and ejaculation are intrinsically linked, it follows that if you cannot achieve an orgasm, then you cannot ejaculate. It's well known that the removal of the foreskin has the effect of desensitising the penis, and it is also well known that the glans (or "bellend"
) is in the majority of cases the part most responsible for triggering the orgasm. Since the foreskin covers and rubs against this area during sexual intercourse, it follows that after circumcision the ability to achieve an orgasm is not only diminished, but in some cases entirely removed.
Now, after talking frankly and in detail about penises and ejaculation, I shall retire to the kitchen to make myself some lunch.
