Marge Simpson offically bears all...wait, what?

looney-bin · #1 10-13-2009, 01:01 PM

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/8300463.stm

I know I'm abit late, but I didn't see a topic for it on here, and was wondering what you guys thought of this story. I find it to be abit disturbing really, since this is Marge Simpson, who wasn't exactly drawn to be a sexual icon.

Anonyman! · #2 10-13-2009, 03:30 PM

It's not like there isn't already loads of this on the internet.

Spirrow · #3 10-13-2009, 03:44 PM

Uhh, I need to see how racy it is before I comment.

Mac Sirloin · #4 10-13-2009, 05:49 PM

The art style can lend itself to some effective T&A.

But seriously, the Simpsons needs to fucking die.

***Nate*** · #5 10-13-2009, 07:57 PM

I read an article asking why they'd use a Simpson's character rather than Lois from Family Guy, which apparently is a much more popular, intelligent and insightful show.

used:) · #6 10-13-2009, 08:00 PM

And where did you read that exactly?

Leto · #7 10-13-2009, 08:09 PM

If this disturbs you in the slightest you have failed at the internet

looney-bin · #8 10-13-2009, 10:06 PM

:

If this disturbs you in the slightest you have failed at the internet

It's not that the character is posing for playboy that bothers me, but it's that the character is posing for playboy. It's asthough Matt Groening saw all the unoffical porn on the internet ("Get out Bart, I'm piss", etc.), and thought "Hey, I can easily top that!" Also, isn't Marge supposed to be sort of a positive role model for women? I can't really imagine her getting her kit off in a studio for a photoshoot. Atleast with the rule 34, you know it's unoffical.

Leto · #9 10-13-2009, 10:14 PM

You really don't understand human sexuality at all do you.

And you also seem to fail at realising Marge Simpson is a 2 dimensional fictional cartoon character, and as such doesn't actually have a personality. I can draw her however the fuck I want.

Strike Witch · #10 10-13-2009, 10:24 PM

At least it ain't animu

Bullet Magnet · #11 10-14-2009, 01:17 AM

She's no Edna Krabappel.

T-nex · #12 10-14-2009, 02:10 AM

Meh... I got introduced to the many wonders of the internet together with Simpson's pron... My friend decided to show it to me back then.

But I think Marge's pose is actually quite cute. She looks sort of innocent even with all the nakedness.

***Wil*** · #13 10-14-2009, 02:19 AM

Wait a minute... It's...

2 bulbs, 1 lamp.

D=

***Nate*** · #14 10-14-2009, 02:41 AM

A year ago, a guy here in Australia was child with child porn offenses because he had a picture of Bart screwing Lisa.

I really, really wish I was kidding.

Bullet Magnet · #15 10-14-2009, 02:47 AM

What if he drew it himself, or wrote a story to that effect? We're talking about being arrested for writing and/or illustrating, which is terrifying.

***Nate*** · #16 10-14-2009, 04:51 AM

It was for possession. I imagine that creating such an image would be even worse.

The 'logic' was that paedophiles might get off on drawn pictures of underage sex. Whilst it doesn't actually hurt anyone, the government decided it was still inappropriate. Unfortunately, the law was general enough to include images that weren't considered erotic but were mostly for the purpose of having a laugh.

shaman · #17 10-14-2009, 09:15 AM

I yeah i remember hearing about that.

So he was convicted?

T-nex · #18 10-14-2009, 09:52 AM

USA is really friggin scary when it comes to such things... One of the things that really makes me not wanna live there.

I think that as long as real human beings don't get hurt then pics literature and whatever is ok even if it's really vile and disgusting.

Wings of Fire · #19 10-14-2009, 10:11 AM

We've had that discussion...

Ahhh...back in the days when I was finally forming my own unique opinions =).

Leto · #20 10-14-2009, 11:00 AM

Only two pages? A debate that wasaint.

Wings of Fire · #21 10-14-2009, 11:05 AM

I think nobody wanted to read T-nex's comment, and this was before the Return of OANST and related stuff.

Also I was right.

T-nex · #22 10-14-2009, 11:58 AM

:

I think nobody wanted to read T-nex's comment, and this was before the Return of OANST and related stuff.

Also I was right.

Leave me out of this >: (

Anonyman! · #23 10-14-2009, 05:04 PM

I want someone to buy this so I can hear about how stupid it is. Or I can just wait for it to inevitably show up elsewhere.

Leto · #24 10-14-2009, 07:26 PM

it'll be uploaded to the internet as soon as it's released

OANST · #25 10-16-2009, 07:46 AM

:

USA is really friggin scary when it comes to such things... One of the things that really makes me not wanna live there.

Umm.......no? Don't know what you think you know, but you don't. You wouldn't get arrested unless there are human people involved, in which case you fucking should be arrested and I hope you fucking die. The larger you, not you.

Sekto Springs · #26 10-16-2009, 10:11 AM

Her personality is what turns me off, not the fact that she's a cartoon.

used:) · #27 10-16-2009, 10:12 AM

That sounds really funny to me for some reason.

shaman · #28 10-16-2009, 10:14 AM

:

Her personality is what turns me on

Good thing it's not her fucking voice.

I mean good God!

T-nex · #29 10-16-2009, 10:45 AM

:

Umm.......no? Don't know what you think you know, but you don't. You wouldn't get arrested unless there are human people involved, in which case you fucking should be arrested and I hope you fucking die. The larger you, not you.

Yea but drawings and cartoon of naked children of any kind IS illegal in USA... Not sure to what extent this law is enforced. But it's still friggin scary. To me at least.. Because I don't know how far these people will go to outlaw things that don't really have anything to do with real life humans.

And yea.. if anyone involves real human beings I agree they need to disappear from this planet.

But It's the whole "lolicon"/"drawn children"/whatever ruled illegal that doesn't sit well with me.

There are a lot of laws in general that scare. But I think as long as people manage to stay quiet and private about their stuff, they can get around that. (And no, I don't encourage child pornography of any kind.)
I just don't find virtual images to be pornography. Just really fucked up images. I mean 'guro' drawings hasn't been outlawed yet(I think), but should they? They are just drawings.

Wings of Fire · #30 10-16-2009, 10:55 AM

I'm Voltairing again.