I think i'd heard that question some where before..... but i'd rather get eaten by a lion, ants gonna take ages and i want to die fast and ants gonna give ya more pain.
__________________ http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/6273/mysig5br.gif
"Why do you have to quote others when you can quote yourself?" (Quote by me)
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God.
You see things, and you say 'why'. But i dream things that never were and i say 'why not'.
Yea a lion is the way to go if your going to be eaten. Ants are just very disturbing. Have you ever seen the movie Killer Ants? Billions of ants invade a home and kill the people inside. There is a lady who is covered in ants lieing in a bathtub dead. Which is spine tingling!
Hello mudflub2. This is a strange question when I first see it, but it is a question to think about. A lion on one hand would be a quick but gruesome way to be eaten. Ants on the other hand would be slow and painful. I would prefer a lion.
After some hard thinking ... I decided to choose a lion.
I think... But, if I had some bug repellent, then I would've chosen the ants! I'd kill 'em before they could get me!
__________________
~[:: Surrender your cookies and you shall not be harmed! ::]~
What does it matter? You didn't say eaten *alive*. I could already be a decomposing corpse by that stage! =P Lions anyway, since they're nicer to look at.