Games Radar talk with Lorne

***Alcar*** · #1 03-31-2002, 03:28 AM

Im sure no one has found this yet, i might be mistakened, but here is an interview Games Radar did with Lorne Lanning.

"With Abe's Oddysee I think that really stemmed from what was initially happening in the rainforests, which were being brought down by people essentially financed by fast food companies"

http://www.gamesradar.com/news/game_news_2979.html

oddguy 999 · #2 03-31-2002, 04:20 AM

Cool interview... I espesally like the bit when he says...

"We're planning on rebuilding a whole fresh engine that optimises Xbox. I think Munch's Oddysee only uses about 50% of what Xbox is capable of and image quality we maybe tapped about 20% of what's there."

***Wil*** · #3 03-31-2002, 07:29 AM

This is a slightly aged interview, but well done for finding it nonetheless. I noticed they used a really old photo of Lorne - he had his hair cut ages ago.

It's kinda like the XBM interview with Lorne and Sherry. "We travelled to San Luis Obispo in California to ask them face to face!" is what they promised. However, if you actually read the article, you'll find it's actually a year-old interview stolen from a PS2 magazine, except with brand new pictures. Go figure.

***Xavier*** · #4 03-31-2002, 09:48 AM

:

Originally posted by Max the Mug
This is a slightly aged interview, but well done for finding it nonetheless. I noticed they used a really old photo of Lorne - he had his hair cut ages ago.

look at the date

:

18-3-02 17:12

it's 13 days ago... no ?

anyway cool interview

***Wil*** · #5 03-31-2002, 01:29 PM

What I mean is that I've seen this interview before.

***Xavier*** · #6 03-31-2002, 01:34 PM

:

Originally posted by Max the Mug
What I mean is that I've seen this interview before.

sorry...
but I'm glad to have it now, cause I don't have your magazine

***Wil*** · #7 03-31-2002, 04:18 PM

Wow, I'm full of misconceptions today...

When I said "It's kinda like the XBM interview" I didn't mean it had the same questions and answers and stuff - it doesn't. What I meant to imply was that they were advertising something they had done, but that was actually old and done by someone else.

But it seems you haven't seen this interview before, so it doesn't really mean anything.