:
Originally posted by PinkHaired Mudokon CWR
1. ...Explain more...
2. Wow, thanks.
|
1. This is going to take a while:
This is what I know about the story: Noah took two of each animal onto his ark (what about all the other organisms, eh?) to stop them being killed by the floods (does this include marine wildlife?).
So. In what way could this be a story of any value?
- Maybe the story was originally made to teach people that in the past there have been mass-extinctions. This theory could be correct if some animals were left behind in the first versions or if, once the rain had subsided, (where did it come from in the first place and how did it go back there?) some animals didn't reproduce. This story may have been changed because nobody had heard of a 'veloceraptor' and they kept forgetting it. This links into evolution because an extinct species can't evolve but those that aren't extinct can. I don't know...
- Maybe the story was originally designed to teach people that it was okay to have incestuous relations. just Noah and his biatch, they can have incest or let humans die-out - the Christian God supports incest, contrary to other parts of the Bible. Same goes for Adam and Eve.
- Maybe the story was originally designed to teach people that God is into sadism and masochism but not in the consenting adults way.
2. It seems, to me at least, that this topic was about the similarities between religion and science. I.e. comparing scientific thories against theological theories, not the theories of different theologies... Maybe I'm wrong, maybe not...