Well, if you bothered to read some of my earlier posts...
Oh, they were worth reading were they?
so nice of you to answer your own question. And what exactly am I immediately assuming is propaganda? I'm not the one that thinks bad art makes the best propaganda. And I'm certainly sorry my quote seemed that way to you. I was looking from the viewpoint of the artist, sorry...
Ahh, you're confusing yourself again. Never mind.
Sure you can. Although, you may not be able to express a work of art in mere words.
"Mere words" my eye.
Absolutely nothing. All I was doing was clearing up what could have been an even bigger misunderstanding than what we have now. It was meant to show that "museum quality" art isn't as known to the public as, well... a crappy anime show on the fox block.
That's where you're wrong.
*gasp* Why, I do declare! I most certainly am!
Tally ho!
How? I'm just saying that I'm not a snooty person. And if describing yourself in a slightly angered tone is "snooty', well than go ahead and call me a Snootball! Whee! 
You missed my point. But then many of my posts are misconstrueable.
I'm not. He said that he was selective and snooty. If anything, he was putting words into the mouth of everyone on the board.
Oh Jesus, it's been a long day.
Wow! No, I'm not!
I'm glad you think so. See, from where I am, you have misunderstood EVERYTHING I intended so far.
*snort* You conformist bastard!
Come meet me, then we'll see who's conformist.
No.
Okay, I will after this post. No doubt you'll waste your time making a hot headed smart ass response, but unfortunately for you I won't read it.
It's not bullcrap. I'm simply making sure that Statikk and I are talking about the same kind of art. The whole "liberal art" phrase is meant to represent more "well known" art forms such as television and music, rather than a cross stuck in a bucket of piss. Besides, I'm not who brought up the concept of liberal art...
I'm glad to know you take it upon yourself to classify art.
I have to commend you on your wit for that one. Seriously. That hurt... if there is one way to insult me, that would be it.
I'm sorry if it insulted you. It certainly wasn't intended too.
I'm hardly am ignoring the issue! If you would just read Statikk's posts! OK... deep breath, count to ten. I'm better. Statikk said that most art is crap, and gave the example of the guy who sold shit to a famous museum. I said that sort of thing was a minority in the art world, and therefore does not count as "most art". That seems just about on topic to me.
Therefore you are conveniently putting the issue aside and ignoring it.
My, my, my. Have we been reduced to petty insults? Now who's bedivilled? I'm sorry if my "most TV is crap" offended you in some way... I was replying to a post in which "liberal art" was brought up, and I stuck in the phrase where I felt it was needed. I may have been a bit... sarcastic and hasty on the subject... but oh well. People make mistakes. People move on...
Oh, I'm so "bedivilled". And offended. I suffer a broken heart. "I stuck in the phrase where I felt it was needed"? That's one way to use language.
Well it was nice of you to answer for Statikk. I'm glad you two are happy.
Yep, just you go one thinking I was answering for him. Well, we are so happy. The perfect couple in fact, aren't we just Statikk?
Nice meeting you, "SeaRex". Oh, yes.. ahh, I'd better not say it, you'd be offended!