View Single Post
  #41  
10-17-2002, 07:07 PM
SeaRex's Avatar
SeaRex
LOLocaust.
 
: Nov 2001
: Tampa Bay Area
: 3,335
Rep Power: 26
SeaRex  (33)

:
Originally posted by ZombieX
So what "liberal" respect do you view art in?
Well, if you bothered to read some of my earlier posts...
:
Ahh, so you immediately assume that it's intended to be propoganda. And furthermore, you state that if it is so intended then that it must be.
so nice of you to answer your own question. And what exactly am I immediately assuming is propaganda? I'm not the one that thinks bad art makes the best propaganda. And I'm certainly sorry my quote seemed that way to you. I was looking from the viewpoint of the artist, sorry...
:
You cannot put the word "art" into a context.
Sure you can. Although, you may not be able to express a work of art in mere words.
:
And what in the world would be wrong with that, might I ask?
Absolutely nothing. All I was doing was clearing up what could have been an even bigger misunderstanding than what we have now. It was meant to show that "museum quality" art isn't as known to the public as, well... a crappy anime show on the fox block.
:
Aren't we getting all bedevilled!
*gasp* Why, I do declare! I most certainly am!
:
Just from that sentence you make yourself sound snooty. Snootball!
How? I'm just saying that I'm not a snooty person. And if describing yourself in a slightly angered tone is "snooty', well than go ahead and call me a Snootball! Whee!
:
He never said that, so stop putting words into his mouth.
I'm not. He said that he was selective and snooty. If anything, he was putting words into the mouth of everyone on the board.
:
Wow! You really are confusing yourself, aren't you!
Wow! No, I'm not!
:
Sounds good to me.
*snort* You conformist bastard!
:
Shut up.
No.
:
Stop creating this bullcrap repetition of "liberal" art.
It's not bullcrap. I'm simply making sure that Statikk and I are talking about the same kind of art. The whole "liberal art" phrase is meant to represent more "well known" art forms such as television and music, rather than a cross stuck in a bucket of piss. Besides, I'm not who brought up the concept of liberal art...
:
You sound like John Kennedy.
I have to commend you on your wit for that one. Seriously. That hurt... if there is one way to insult me, that would be it.
:
You consider it "crazy" to make money out of giving you excrement to a museum? Oh well. As it's a minority in "the art world" let's just conveniently put the issue aside and ignore it.
I'm hardly am ignoring the issue! If you would just read Statikk's posts! OK... deep breath, count to ten. I'm better. Statikk said that most art is crap, and gave the example of the guy who sold shit to a famous museum. I said that sort of thing was a minority in the art world, and therefore does not count as "most art". That seems just about on topic to me.
:
You're the only retarded moron farting on about liberal this and liberal that. And most TV you watch is crap.
My, my, my. Have we been reduced to petty insults? Now who's bedivilled? I'm sorry if my "most TV is crap" offended you in some way... I was replying to a post in which "liberal art" was brought up, and I stuck in the phrase where I felt it was needed. I may have been a bit... sarcastic and hasty on the subject... but oh well. People make mistakes. People move on...
:
Ecstatic I'm sure.
Well it was nice of you to answer for Statikk. I'm glad you two are happy.

Last edited by SeaRex; 10-17-2002 at 11:10 AM..
Reply With Quote