:
Originally posted by Alcar
What I can do is proper some supposable problems people have against MO.
|
What the hell does this sentence mean? "Proper" isn't a verb... "Supposable" isn't even a word, I don't think...
:
|
1. Yay! *adds MojoMan220 to the list of MO liking people*
|
Ha! You don't make a big deal out of it being their opinions when they agree with you, do you?
:
|
Example: Im sure you liked Ronald McDonald when you were younger, but now he seems very childish.
|
I was
shit-scared of Ronald McDonald when I was younger, and I still am...
:
|
2. Jeesh, can people take a joke! Come on "fart breath" was clearly OWI having some fun! Making games isn't all about boring things.
|
The point Chris was making is that "Fart Breath" is a very childish joke, and therefore will only be considered funny by children and childish adults... Still, I'm sure we can all see the "fun" in making a little computer sprite say "fart breath"... Ha ha ha, Wheee!
:
|
1. Keyword in what you just said: "Prefer".
|
Why do you make out that anybody else's opinions can simply be dismissed because they are Opinions, whereas you seem to believe that your own opinions are some kind of Noble Truth that can be used to refute any arguments made by anyone else?
:
|
2. Im a teen, I find it funny to see that happen.
|
See?
:
|
It all depends on your preferances. There is humour in the game, but it is an all round humour.
|
No, it isn't. It's childish humour. "All-round humour" would be something that appeals to all kinds of people. "Fart breath" only appeals to children. And you, apparently.
:
|
You have to cater for everyone, you can't have the game targeted at the teen audience all the time. Wanting to have a game always targeted at your age group is extremely selfish.
|
We don't want it targeted at a Teen Audience, because then we'd just have Dawson's Creek in a computer game... (Oh, the horror...) What we want is a return to the original games, which weren't targeted at
any particular age group, but appealed to children, adolescents, and adults (as can be observed by noting the wide variety of ages on the forums).
Look, if you want proof that MO is targeting a much narrower (and younger) age group than the first two, just look at
us. When the forums were first founded, we got members coming in from a wide variety of age groups. Many of them are still here today.
But look at the people who have joined since MO, and you will see that the
vast majority of newbies are now young children. This is living proof of OWI's change in target audience. What more do you want?