:
|
This is odiophra. Neither condemned nor commanded. (1)So what I ask is "Is sex education a good idea?" (2)The conclusion I reach is no.(3) It supports things many find to be repulsive and immoral,(4) is relativistic and servees no purpose in a school. (5)It should not be in the curriculum,(6) thats a joke.(7) To say that lteaching how to put a condom on is useful so Pete can put one on and bang his girlfriend/boyfriend is good thing, whereas making standards higher, requiring more math and more science to be mandatory and actually look at someone's SAT score and grades before letting them pass is "wrong" is ludicrous.
|
(1) - And, do we care what you "Ask"!?...Nope
(2) - Hey...thats the same conclusion i met with the above!! (Surprising enuff!!)
(3) - The people who find it 'Repulsive' and 'Immoral' are the people who cant get any and when they do its missionary style all the time. They may also be old...since sex was a 'taboo' subject in the past. Also thats fecking ludricous...wot retard thinks its 'Immoral'!! let alone repulsive!
(4) - If you had my family you would be thinking diff...my family never taught me about sex...thankfully i had skool and my frends to fill me in. Do u kn0 how embarassing it is to not know what 'Shagging' is when your in yr 4 upwards!!
(5) - Freak.
(6) - Im glad you are.
(7) - And if that kid 'Pete' didn't put one on he would either get her pregnant or catch something. Its a good thing to teach this, although most teens know EVERYTHING about sex from a early age...such as myself. And what do you mean by 'Making standards higher'? Science shouldn't be mandatory, maths should however. I will explain later...i am tired and need alkohol...goodbye