"Here's a map of arbitrary geographical divisions as you can see Trump won the ones with on average less people."
I don't see your point. Large tracts of land don't have political interests that need consideration. idk why but Americans seem to have this fixation of seeing these things very black and white (or blue and red). Like I'm sure many of those counties were within a few percentage points of being coloured differently. And with a directly elected president the conservative votes in the more urban states for Trump actually would have mattered, likewise for the slightly-less-conservative votes for Hillary in the red rectangles.
:
|
Mind naming those states?
|
The ones that weren't a foregone conclusion before election day.