:
|
So, ultimately I would define “being a woman” as someone who intrinsically identifies as a woman.
|
lmao, where'd you get that definition from, the ministry of truth?
"A woman is anyone who identifies as a woman" is a pretty blatant logical fallacy. Like so blatantly so I don't believe you really even think that's true. And anyone who (somehow) misses the obvious flaw can only make sense of the statement because they have some preconcieved notion of what a woman is. hmmmmm, i wonder what that could be?
:
woman
noun
1 An adult human female:
'a jury of seven women and five men'
|
yeah it's probably that.
Futhermore you earlier said this:
:
|
It may just be a word to you, but it has deep connotations – especially to a trans person who is seeking acceptance in a society that often disrespects, marginalizes or attacks them.
|
What deep connotations can "man" and "woman" have when by your own defintion the only prerequisite is identifying with the mere words themselves? Why should anyone care about being "misgendered" when your definition of woman is inclusive to potentially anyone? You go on to talk about bathrooms. By your definitions, what is the point of sex segregated spaces when men and women are reduced to utterly meaningless concepts? Should women be expected to share their changing rooms and toilets with Danielle Muscato just because she identifies as a woman (whatever that even means)?
See this is why transgender ideology is inherently conservative and sexist. There's no way social justice warriors would ever champion Danielle, because that would freak people out. Only men who become some sort of carictature of women and wear makeup and feminine clothing and reinforce every other sexist expectation of women get to use women's spaces.
:
|
Hold on, you can’t say gender is not sociological because society treats gender and sex as synonymous – all that means is that society has a sociological understanding of gender which treats the two as one.
Gender is a social construct – just because our society’s general understanding of the construct they have created is poor, this does not mean it is not sociological; our society has indeed created the concept of gender, it is just poorly recognized and not properly separated on a wider scale.
|
Either people subscribe to the social construct of gender as an identity or they do not. You can't say "someone is a woman because they fall within socially constructed definition of a woman" despite society largely not acknowledging this definition. That's how social constructs (as oppossed to physical ones) work; they require social acceptance.
Ultimately if you do not subscribe to the idea of "gender as an identity" then you are incapable of misgendering anyone.
eww, eww, yucky vaginas! o wait. its almost like we are a sexual species. It's almost like the existence of the two sexes has had tremendous social implications across every society that ever existed, hmmmmm maybe we should acknowledge they exist then? I find the insinuation that non-trans people are obsessed with genitals particularly annoying when sex-reassignment surgery exists.