:
|
I think that's a good time to say that my point was nothing in the pose alone was sexual, and yet they're removing it.
|
I’ve already pointed out why I disagree with that. The pose has sexual connotations.
:
|
And it's hard to buy their argument of "we we're already wanting to remove it", especially since they do seem to have a history of censoring things that don't need to be censored:
|
That doesn’t make it harder to buy, it makes it easier – if they have a history of removing things from their game then it stands to reason that they would be more likely to remove more. There’s no evidence that the magazines were removed due to complaints, so you’ll have to present some evidence of that before this point makes sense.
:
|
Do you think it was the same guy who modeled/designed the magazine that took it upon himself to delete its instances from the level?
|
So unless the exact artist on the team is the one who deletes it from the game, it doesn’t count as a voluntary decision on the part of the development studio?