:
|
As someone who's interviewed Lorne twice, I can tell you that there are good interviews and bad interviews. And the main differences are (a) asking questions on which he can give interesting answers (hint: minutia about differences between architecture of different types of RAM chips isn't interesting) and (b) editing his segues into a coherent flow of prose. This interviewer has done neither.
EDIT: Those rules can be said of any interview, really. Not just Lorne.
|
Yes, when you interviewed him, it was really interesting because we actually learned some new things about Oddworld (unlike the majority of Lanning's interviews who are pointless).
FrustratedAssassin, get over it. Lanning couldn't - and shouldn't - care less of what being said here (it's naive to think otherwise). Moreover, what did you learn from Alex, except that "look, I know a lot of things about Oddworld, but I can't tell you a single thing" ?