:
|
How is it clear in any way other than what I suggested?
|
The people that wrote the book liked their prose, even though they aren't particularly good at it. They like to present their ideas with a bit of a flourish. So, saying that the "man lays with a man as he would with a woman" section doesn't make sense, or only precludes anal sex just seems a bit like reaching to me. It also seems like a waste of time. Because you are basically saying that the text actually does lay out the ways in which a person should live their life, but it isn't being interpreted correctly. It doesn't. It's drivel. That should be the focus. Not the interpretation.