:
Please explain why you come to that conclusion.
|
It's highly subjective, but I, after hearing about the murders, didn't go get a gun and seek revenge or do anything radical specifically aimed at Muslim people, the thought didn't really occur to me. I consider myself a normal, sane person, I don't believe violence is a good way of doing things no matter how many cartoonists are killed. I don't think any of you really though about that
(even Havoc). Sounds like a stupid plan then, doesn't it?
Does it really further your point? These 'attacks' are pitiful. Like, really pitiful. Somebody sprayed a graffiti... boo fucking hoo. It's not even an attack. It's basically the same 'attack' as the comic strips. The only attack that actually caused harm to anyone is that kid assault, yet we don't know the full context, and therefore it's possible that it could be manipulated. The kid might have been looking for trouble.
My second argument would be that we're talking about kinds of people who blow themselves in terrorist attacks or shoot people who insulted their religion and go to jail for life (mostly). That sounds like idiots for me. I would not overestimate them by saying they're capable of thinking that far and coming up with such complex psychological plan.
I didn't present those arguments before, because I know they're not 100% conclusive and still leave a margin of error that some people might actually plan this like that. I just think it's improbable