I've just tried to read the dispute about the article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus
(which is here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hi...y_of_Jesus#.23 )
But I just can't stand the amount of bullshit in both the article and the dispute. I also can't stand that in "Accepted historic facts" (whether it's gramatically correct or not) there are statements, but there is almost no explanation behind them (why they are accepted), except of what scholar said it's true