:
|
2. No matter what culture it is, men with more developed "masculine" features were more atractive (again, women uncouscioulsy think that their offsrpings will be stronger).
|
So...let me get this right. Your saying, that women fancy (As it were) men who looked masculine. Thats wrong, as most women do have a tendency to fancy Gay Guyz and we all know some gay guyz arn't exactly masculine looking. Thats that theory out of the window.
:
|
1. No matter what culture it is, the most attractive persons were those who had a higher level of simetry between their left and right sides (maybe uncounscioulsy humans think that the more simetric individuals are more perfect, therefore more likely to survive (?) )
|
Example...Sophie Ellis Bexter, and no offense to her but...Eww...NOT attractive what-so-ever. Most men think that.
:
|
3. Women with bigger illiac bones (which causes women to develop big "butts" and thin abdomens) were more atractive than women with smaller ones, probably because women with bigger illiac bones can easily bare children.
|
Again, most men dont want big 'Butts' as you put it. Men prefare smaller backends and pert tight ones. Not big ones.
Ok...i just read the rest of your post and they weren't your theories...shit. Dont matter...they aint directed at you no more.
:
|
When the earth arond us just,dies,we will adapt with certain...er...parts to live there.
|
If you mean Dies as in no rain, no grass, no trees, no ozone layer only sun...hot sun. And if you mean this happening quickly...we would most likely die (If it happened quickly.) However if it happened slowly technology would help...and we may also adapt. But since the world is going to be hit by asteroids...which may/hopefully end all existence on Earth in 800 yrs time...i doubt that would happen. Oh...and also...in a couple of billion years time, the Sun is going to Xplode...HURRAH!! What a even to be looking forward to!!