View Single Post
  #108  
12-19-2012, 09:40 AM
Manco's Avatar
Manco
Posts walls of text
 
: Aug 2007
: based damage system
: 4,751
Blog Entries: 11
Rep Power: 31
Manco  (14074)Manco  (14074)Manco  (14074)Manco  (14074)Manco  (14074)Manco  (14074)Manco  (14074)Manco  (14074)Manco  (14074)Manco  (14074)Manco  (14074)

:
No. Don't be dumb. If there is a nuclear melt down would it be inappropriate to discuss new safe guards for nuclear power plants? People who say that it's inappropriate to discuss how we can get rid of the tools that are used to kill human beings right after human beings have been killed with them are fucking retards. It's not disrespectful. It's fucking respectful. I respect your loss enough to not want it to happen again. I don't want gun control because I'm a dirty hippy. I want gun control so that we can limit how often lives are taken by guns. It's not a political agenda. It's a human, and compassionate agenda. So, suck my dick.
So what’s the difference between that and using a tragedy to highlight how other, similar tragedies happen frequently and go unreported?

Like, what makes one a Good Thing and the other a Bad Thing? Because one involves people in another country? Because it points out that these aren’t the only deaths in the world? Why?
__________________


twitter (stream of thoughts)
steam (games i never play)

Reply With Quote