:
|
I don't follow your logic there. The looping had been going on for quite some time before the Rainmaker took control of organised crime. He shook things up by closing all the loops.
|
alright I got this one wrong. but it still doesn't make much sense.
so the rainmaker has the idea of killing the loopers by sending them back in time. so when the young boy won't become the rainmaker there won't be this "closing all the loops" thus there won't be the contract of killing your elder self. ---> no bruce willis in the past ---> no danger for the kid ---> no suicide of the younger joe ---> kid still wouldn't become the rainmaker because he needs the alternative reality of his mom getting killed.
also why don't they just send the loopers or whoever 200 years or better, 5 billion years back to the past (no earth) - you wouldn't need any loopers at all.
ALSO, why don't they just kill the people and send the dead bodies into the past? they killed joe's wife (by accident) and dragged her body to the time machine.
and really what was the purpose of dismantling the one looper? they kept the young looper alive and tortured him. only for the fun? and if the younger one looses his finger for example, why should the elder one looses his one too? there's no history of that, the only possible one would be that he escaped or survived for 30 years.
but like OANST pointed out, it wasn't intended to be logical. but it still bugs me.