:
Originally posted by Danny
I think you misinterpreted me there, Doug. I wasn't angry, I was just answering your question, or what I assumed your question was, anyway...
|
Sorry if I misunderstood, Danny. I just honestly thought a statement punctuated with "for f**ks sake" reflected anger. And I certainly did not intend to be patronizing.
:
|
Honest question: Why not? If there were no Nuclear Weapons, there could be no Nuclear Attacks, and I think we all agree that that would be a good thing...
|
I'm all for complete, multilateral disarmament. I'm all for the complete eradication of nuclear weapons. I just think unilateral disarmament by the US would be foolhardy. It would be nice to think we could just say: "OK, we'll go first. Then you go." I am naive; I freely admit it. But I'm not that naive.